Because North Korea is nothing like Iraq. Unlike the Iraqi's under Sadam, North Koreans are organized, extremely passionate and ready to die to defend their country, their leader and their ideals. They have a massive land army, hundreds of MIG fighter planes and modern missle technology to boot. Not to mention a nuke or two. Invading North Korea would be like playing russian roulette, you just dont know what's gonna happen. It could lead to WW3 since China will back them, including Iran, and all those facist nations. The only way we can safely overthrow the North Korean regime is by waging an idea war. If only we can show those poor people how the world really is out there, they will kill that hermit themselves. But the brainwashing and mind control is so thorough, one can only hope.
2006-06-19 17:40:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by FooFighter 2
·
3⤊
4⤋
Because it would be easier to invade Canada instead. We need to liberate the Canadians from the French. Besides, the North Koreans are no threat to us even if they have a nuclear bomb. The only way they can deliver a nuclear strike to us is to use Kia or Hyundai cars. And if you've ever seen the JD Powers report on initial quality for those unreliable tin boxes, you'd laugh so hard it's not even funny. They could, however, use UPS or FedEx to deliver the nukes. But both carriers do not deliver on weekends or overnight and the currency exchange ratio is prohibitively too expensive the only thing they can afford to send and strike us with are rice crackers. So relax! Canadians are easier targets. We'll plunder their natural resources. Think of all the bacons, maple syrup and Canadian babes we can have.
2006-06-19 21:22:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by andre 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
because through invading the north ought to set off a protection rigidity reaction from China, because china is the in undemanding words best chum that North a korea has. Plus invading or unifying the koreas would fee a good number of money to rebuild the North, and some South Korean imagine it is going to weaken their own economic device. it really is why they don't look doing some thing.
2016-11-15 00:21:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by venessa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
With all the crap we are getting about troop deaths the cost of the war in such a minor action as Iraq.How in hell do you think we are supposed to get you bleeding hearts to go along with a fight that would mean hundreds of lives a day and cost billions.It would not just be a war with North Korea but with China also.The hypocrisy is yours,every Democrat in congress had the same information as Bush,they all voted for the war.Talk to your congress man and senator,they are the ones who authorize war.
2006-06-19 22:43:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US have WMD and the US are the ONLY Nation on this Planet, who actually USED them. Should other Nations invade the US, because of the actual threat the US poses to World Peace and the aggressive & arrogant attitude of the US towards other Nations ?
Get a Clue !
2006-06-19 17:35:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by PasoFino 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
North Korea is not a short-term threat. They are trying to arm up in an attempt to discourage us from attacking them even though we don't want to. Not to mention Iraq has the second biggest oil reserve in the world. We are dependent on Oil, it is in our best interest if we control it rather than it being controled but unstable facists governments. Think about it, one of the most precious commodities in the world being controled in unstable environments by unstable governments. This is the reason we are there no matter what they tell us. Think of it like red light cameras. They tell us it's to save lives but it's really generating revenue.
2006-06-19 17:42:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by CA 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, they already have nukes, thanks to your buddy Clinton. Second, invading them would draw China and possibly Russia into it as well, and it's unlikely we could win such a war without using nukes, which is in no one's best interest.
The only hypocrisy I saw coming out of the Iraq war was Sen. Kerry speaking about how irresponsible it would be to vote against the funds to supply our troops there, then turning around and voting against them anyway. I could also mention voting to authorize the war, then voting not to fund it. Exactly how do you Democrats reconcile that?
2006-06-19 17:36:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chris S 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats a good question. The main reason is that it would probally force the continent to unite and cause a massive political change in Asia. But if they test they're nukes, we'll turn them into a parking lot in minutes!
2006-06-19 17:38:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by chicagoan86 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
will cause deaths of millions, war is not the alternative to this problem. PEACE!!
2006-06-19 17:30:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Rocker 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should not invade North Korea. Nuke the bastards !!!!
2006-06-19 17:29:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋