answer this situation below?

Question

Washington is director of a local hospice service. Unrelated 2 her work with hospice,she's serves on a statewide advisory board that makes recommendations about allocation of medicaid services.In response 2 a dramatic decrease in federal appropriations,the board is mandated 2 recommend funding cuts 2 specific programs.Ms.Washngton & other board members are asked 2 choose between eliminating funding 4 adolescent well-child screening programs that serve tens of thousand of youth,or eliminating a single costly program that provides catastrophic assistance 2 only a few individuals.B'coz of her experience w/ hospice care,Ms.Washington recognizes the importance of programs 2 help w/ catastrophic illness;however,she is hesitant 2 advice eliminatng a program dat s proven 2 help large numbers of chldren.As an advisory board member,what is Ms.Washngton's responsiblty 2 the large number of adolescent who would b denied health care if the well-child program 4 adolescents were no longer funded?

Answer 1

she needs to find a way to make both programs operate with less funds, if she's creative, it can be done

Answer 2

as an advisory board member ms. washington has no responsibility because her role is advisory. it is he responsibility of the board to make a final decesion and then face the consequences of that decision and come up with alternative funding for the well-child program

Answer 3

a million. a cue is utilized in snooker so i do not realize. 2. i'd sense like i'm being bumped up and down. 3. "gosh, i'm all moist" 4. i'd say some thing to the gadget operator no longer to a timber horse.

Answer 4

4 were left

Answer 5

If one has to be chosen to be cut, I would cut the one which helped a small number greatly