English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Aggression is met with aggression. Sorry were not done yet.

2006-06-19 13:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Don't worry, in 50 or so year's it'll be Mexican aggressive policies against the world.

I don't know what you call aggressive. Business? Politics?

If you haven't noticed about half the world isn't free. You are invited to go live in one of those countries that America can't strech far enough for real democracy.

And tell a free Iraqi, wether right to go in or not, if they like their freedom. The insurgents don't represent the majority there.

Sometimes it sucks being the leaders of the free world. Why don't we let Uganda do it next?

2006-06-19 20:59:42 · answer #2 · answered by yars232c 6 · 0 0

I think the best way to provide a real solution to the USA's aggressions to the rest of the world is to: raise our hands in surrender and lower our standard of living to that of third world nations so that we will be just like them. We also need to throw away our freedoms and government, get a King or dictator that can reduce our wealth and abuse our natural resources, provide us with the just enough to live on so we will lose our drive and desire to increase our lot in life through hard work. Then we will be at peace because we can then hate England.

2006-06-19 21:11:40 · answer #3 · answered by USA ALL THE WAY 1 · 0 0

There is no aggressive policy. Our government has the RESPONSIBILITY to protect it's citizens. Afghanistan's Taliban harbored and aided those who killed thousands of Americans. Iraq has been a threat to our interests and allies for years. Why should our government allow someone like Saddam Hussein continue to work to build his military, invade our allies, or threaten American interests? If allowed to continue the loss of American lives and lives of our allies would have been much worse. The amount of destruction in the region also would have been worse. We saved the world from Nazis and Japan, how many countries did we take over? Zero. We freed the Muslims from Milosevic. Did we take them over? Acted in Grenada. Them? Haiti? Afghanistan? Iraq? Korea? Had troops in China during WW2. Take them over? Did we keep France when we liberated them? Holland? Belgium? The Philippines? So tell me, what aggressive policy?

2006-06-19 21:07:14 · answer #4 · answered by alieneddiexxx 4 · 0 0

America will not stop being agressive to anyone until we run the world and have control of all the riches in it. It has nothing to do with whatever third world country is jealous of us. That is ridiculous! That is why they all chant death to america?! It is more like we are greedy, greedy, greedy. We want everything done for us and given to us free. Ever notice how all our politicians are paid ridiculously while half the population lives below the poverty level? Our leaders are money hungry and will sacrifice all the people in the world to have more of it!

2006-06-19 21:27:37 · answer #5 · answered by reallifeanswers 2 · 0 0

Oh.....I'm sorry, you meant the right for America and Americans to protect themselves from unsolicited attack by third world countries who are jealous of the prosperity we tend to have compared to the rest of the world. Well, let's hope that we'll continue to have leaders in America that will take the responsibility of protecting our country seriously from now on and teach those who chose to be hostile towards our country, that they will be delt with accordingly.

2006-06-19 20:58:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i don't think so. They're too rich and too crazy. Nobody hated Canadian, or Mexican, and W.Bush doesn't understand why.
But BinLaden and The Raìss of Baghdad aren't gentlemen, too. Too much arab black gold, too much western money.
We, the poor normal people, are all victims in this history. We could be in the twin towers, in the spanish station of Atocha, or in Palestine, or in Afghanistan...

2006-06-19 21:05:08 · answer #7 · answered by michelesilenzio 2 · 0 0

oh ya, we're real agressive, lets just appolagize about that time we acted based on lies and attacked Hitler when he just wanted to exterminate a few jews, oh and we shoulda just given Togo the oil he demanded; who cares if he killed a few million chinese and vietnamese with it. oh and when North Korea tryed to kill all the democratic citizens of South Korea we shoulden't have interfeared. and When Saddam tried to build his Middleeastern Empire with blood and oil... well our mistake
wow, we are just so damn agressive arent we?

2006-06-19 21:11:01 · answer #8 · answered by ben s 3 · 0 0

Ahmedgetton?

2006-06-19 20:56:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Maybe another "Market-Crash" and Depression. The common American had it mighty tough, but they weren't jumping out of buildings.

2006-06-19 21:07:03 · answer #10 · answered by Ambers'Dad 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers