2006-06-19 13:20:52 · 28 answers · asked by Menifeedave 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That's one thing you can say the democrats do well, pick the worst possible candidates. If you tried you would be hard pressed to come up with a list of worse candidates than the democrats have run for president in the last fifty years. The only shining star, if you can call him that, is Clinton. He won because of the third party candidacy of Ross Perot and never received a majority of the vote. The Republicans are grateful I'm sure.
1968 Hubert Horatio Humphrey
1972 George Stanley McGovern
1976-80 James Earl Carter, Jr. Walter Frederick Mondale
1984 Walter Frederick Mondale
1988 Michael Stanley Dukakis
1992-96 Bill Clinton
2000 Albert Arnold Gore, Jr.
2004 John Forbes Kerry
2006-06-19 13:39:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well apparently that is the best they can come up with. I mean look who they voted to be the DNC Chairman for peets sake! LOL Howard Dean, he is a complete moron and only raised $5 million dollars for the democratic party this year. They have no vision for the country, and all they can spew out or thier mouths is hate and how republicans are so bad. Most of thier so called leaders are far far left wing nuts, and have horrible voting records in congress also. So yes, the Democratic party is in shambles and will not win an election for a long time unless they get thier act together.
2006-06-19 13:43:35 · answer #2 · answered by Adam H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Plffooooo! Schnolllloooo! Ploooploooploo! Choooweeoooeaaa!
TRANSLATION:
Hello there, this is Sampson the Elephant.
I'm not sure whether this is simply a taunting question or whether you are actually searching for information! But to say that there are 300 million democrats in America is untrue, and to say that they are all qualified to be President is also untrue. You are a disgrace to this political party, and I think you should switch to the ANP as quickly as possible, thank you. I will now consider you a Hitlerite.
This translation brought to you by the GOP. That's the GOP- playing devil's advocate since our politicians could burst into tears!
2006-06-19 13:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kerry was a BAD choice. Even as a liberal I say that. A person who flipflops is not a trustworthy person.
I'm hoping that the Democrats pick Obama for 08.
But I dont know how well a black democrat would do these days.
2006-06-19 13:24:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who said it was going to be Kerry. It might be Gore, or Edwards or someone else. We will have to see. A lot can happen in 2 years! Especially in New Hampshire.
Thanks to Bush, we finally have a Democrat for a governor!! He clobbered the sitting Governor, who wasn't well liked anyway!
2006-06-19 13:26:17 · answer #5 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The word is HAD, I don't think the Democrats would vote for Kerry again!
2006-06-19 14:54:13 · answer #6 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Connecticut , we have wonderful senators, Dodd, Lieberman,
Delora, and Attorney General Blumenthal
New York has Hillary Clinton and I still like Gore. I also like Biden.
Face it , after the Bush Family everyone else looks brilliant.
2006-06-19 13:38:52 · answer #7 · answered by nemesis 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, at least the democrats didn't stoop to just running their best looking candidate for President.
The had the grace and dignity to reserve that for the Vice Presidential position.
2006-06-19 13:35:04 · answer #8 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't be too hard on John Kerry. The poor man's short term memory is shot. "I voted for it then I voted against it" or in 2003 I believe it was " Anyone who doesn't believe that Saddam Husein is not a threat shouldn't vote for me"
2006-06-19 13:34:40 · answer #9 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was all a ploy.
No way was John Kerry the best. In fact, he was one of the worst. But it was all the doings of the illuminati. :)
2006-06-19 13:24:03 · answer #10 · answered by Pretty_Trini_Rican 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋