Prepared to send the children of other people to die for their causes. Pres Bush snr. a decorated war hero knew the consequencies of war. He was able to mitigate the loss of American lives during Gulf War 1. The present administration to a man and woman did all they could to avoid fighting for America. The supporters of this and all future wars will cower under their blankets if they were drafted to fight for America, so why are they so blood thirsty?
2006-06-19 12:07:21 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
People are not dying for Amerika. They are dying for Bush and co. You are not dying for your country unless there is a war in your country. In this case there is not. People are dying for rich men's ideals and agendas.
2006-06-19 12:20:47 · answer #1 · answered by Mac J 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I would like to see a few Congressmen, Senators,etc. be made to put a weapon in their hands and be forced to contribute in the Iraq situation!!!Maybe that would give them a diff perspective if they had to go patrol the streets of Bagdhad. And have the threat of not knowing if you will live to see daylight wondering if you will get hit with a bomb.
Some people take their lives for granted and do not realize what others have done to protect our country and mankind.I agree there are many wars that made no sense as to why U.S has to get involved. I believe we should focus on our nations security so that these terrorists cannot enter the U.S. We are just wasting money fighting this war in Iraq.
2006-06-19 19:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
War is not healthy for children and all living things. However war is profitable for the rich and although there are rich democrats the majority of lets get it all people are republicans. They don't want to fight, the middle class and the poor can fight. The rich just reap the monetary benefits.
2006-06-19 19:13:57 · answer #3 · answered by olderandwiser 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isnt about war, terror, correctness, its about money, plain and simple. For whatever reason George W decided it would support his power and money base to invade Iraq. In my opinion we should throw it back to the days of medieval knights. If you want to be king and go to war...then you lead the charge into battle.
2006-06-19 19:11:43 · answer #4 · answered by zw88 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah they are called Liberals, and they are for war if they aren't in it.
P.S. - "se_roddy" served bravely in the Girl Scouts so he's different.
2006-06-19 19:11:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are callous enough to send people to make war, and cause death for their own profit
2006-06-20 11:27:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess we could surrender to the terrorists instead.Would that make you liberal America haters happy?
2006-06-19 19:12:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah they are called Republicans, and they are for war if they aren't in it.
2006-06-19 19:09:17 · answer #8 · answered by se_roddy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
, The animal propensity is to Eat ,Sleep, Mate ,& Defend .The Human propensity
is to Reason & Discrimenate .Not just be animals.
2006-06-19 19:25:22 · answer #9 · answered by Dvplanetwaves 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel that if you have not served in the US military you have no right to vote! What do you think?
2006-06-19 19:11:48 · answer #10 · answered by Pobept 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋