when she knew she had H.I.V one of the men got HIV so she was charged with GBH what do you think should had happen if you where the judge or made the law
2006-06-19 11:17:30 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I think she should been charged with attempted murder, and murder if any of the men die from this. She must have known what she was doing, so she should pay the consequences.
2006-06-29 05:46:52 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It definately should have been more than 2 and a half years. Thats GBH with Intent, maximum sentence being life. And she got what? 2.5 months per person?
2006-06-19 22:45:01 · answer #2 · answered by Master Mevans 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The intent to transmit a deadly disease is equivalent to the intent to shoot someone. Was she prostituting? If so, her real intention was to get money and HIV was merely hidden from the men. Perhaps, that's why she got only 2 1/2 years.
2006-07-02 05:58:29 · answer #3 · answered by jim-dandy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that's justified because her senseless actions will now cause a man to live his life with a disease that will probably take his life in the end; it's endangerment of another human's life. However, men should be smarter than that and when they're with a stranger put on a condom. Then again, maybe they shouldn't be as smart, natural selection takes its toll as the world keeps growing overpopulated... if they don't have the survival instinct to ward their prized gems from disease..........
2006-06-19 11:22:34 · answer #4 · answered by Maggie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it does make sense if she never told the men that she was infected. Saying that, it is just as much the man's fault because, as they say, it takes two to tango. The man knew what he was doing. If people want to sleep around, they should make sure they are protected. Still, all depends on the circumstances. As for persuading him to have unprotected sex, sorry people, but he wouldn't have done it if he didn't want to. You can't make somene have unprotected sex(unless you rape them, which I guess wasn't the case so the man still had the choice to say no)
2006-06-19 11:35:37 · answer #5 · answered by Evil J.Twin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In this day and age it is up to individuals to be responsible for their own sexual health, but the guy who got hiv from her was in a long term relationship with her and she persuaded him to have unprotected sex.
She should have a life sentence as that is what she has given the guy. She knew she had hiv and should have been upfront and honest about it, as it is a killer as is she.
2006-06-19 11:31:10 · answer #6 · answered by debisioux 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she was totally in the wrong and evil for doing what she did, as she had intent to infect these guys...but at the same time i think they are stupid for going around having unprotected sex! You can't just assume some1 is ok....use protection everyone! Its kinda their own fault.... whos to say they have not gone and passed it on to someone else now?? I do feel sorry for the guys involved but they were stupid!
2006-06-19 11:23:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to say, If I was the judge, knowing that she knew she had HIV, Id Have charged her with attempted murder
2006-06-19 11:21:28 · answer #8 · answered by DonnaDoop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she should be sent to prison for a long time. Knowing you have a fatal disease and passing it on knowingly in such a malicious way is appalling. What a *****. Gives us women a bad name.
Should she be done for attempted murder? maybe. Not sure.
2006-06-19 11:32:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about these 120 men men? What happened with them.Have they all gone to heaven already?
2006-06-19 21:19:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋