Ummmm that's kind of a bad situation either way. I think I'll take my chances and find out instead. But if I had to choose, I think 80 years is worth it.
2006-06-19 11:03:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Carolina Kitten 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
40
2006-06-19 11:02:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by leishie!!! 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd rather die at 40 pain free. Otherwise, what's the point. Life is to enjoy.
2006-06-19 11:11:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by GJneedsanswers 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would really depend on how my 40 to 80 years go.
2006-06-19 11:24:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by p.g 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A painful death is almost sure for us if we live long enough, cancer and other diseases are already lurking in our bodies, However even a death at 40 would be painful if caused by illness.
Who can know what is hidden in our genetic baggage?
The best answer is to be ready to say good-bye as soon as possible when ilness strikes.
2006-06-19 11:12:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by lennier61 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
40 pain free cuz that is really bad that u will have 2 suffer when ur that old
2006-06-19 11:03:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by PrettyPink 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can really diside so i'll just choose 40 because you don't want to die with pain, do you.
2006-06-19 11:08:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Princess Answers 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
80 I want to live a long and happy life.
2006-06-19 11:02:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by SAHM/Part Time Tutor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋