he would only get credit for spelling his name right
2006-06-19 10:22:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by svv42 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
There are no "experts" at guessing the IQ's of persons who have not taken normed assessments. persons with IQ's of ninety one do no longer earn Harvard MBA's. George Bush's SAT score became 1206, which positioned him in the 83rd percentile (basically sixteen% scored greater). that's no longer Mensa high quality, in spite of the indisputable fact that it is not shabby the two. The SAT isn't an IQ attempt, yet SAT rankings have a intense (.80) correlation to IQ. lots of the presidents whose rankings have been guessed incorporate adult adult males whose IQ's have been formally examined. President Kennedy had an IQ of 119; the sua dissant experts guessed 174. in accordance to the object, this wager became in step with one million) his scholarly achievements (he graduated sixty fifth out of one hundred ten in his intense college classification); 2) writings that he wrote on my own (Profiles in braveness became in all likelihood ghosted by utilising Theodore Sorensen), and so on. Does bill Clinton particularly have an IQ of 182? If there have been information that bill Clinton had an IQ in this selection, you've got heard all approximately it. For assessment, Albert Einstein's grownup IQ became purely over one hundred sixty, and Linus Pauling's became 147. The qualifying score for Mensa is approximately 132. the known intense college grad has an IQ of a hundred and five; the known college grad, a hundred and fifteen. President Nixon had an IQ of 143; the experts guessed a hundred and fifty five. i might wish that graduate pupils of philosophy have a diverse popular of "information" than the Bakersville information provider has. i might wish additionally that they are in a position to correctly known a hatchet job.
2016-12-08 22:53:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by allateef 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
As much as I tend to totally disagree with the policies of this particular adminstration, respect for the office of the Presidency and the fact that he and his pals have managed to so effectively undermine so many parts of the Constitution make me reticent to say that he is unintelligent. Perhaps not a great extemporaneous speaker, and not good at pronouciation, neither of which make him unintelligent, just unfortunate perhaps. Sadly, given the circumstances of the Occupation of Iraq, I believe that Bush is more dangerous than unintelligent. But back to the question at hand..
135
2006-06-19 10:27:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Amber Jumelez 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmmmm he made it the presidency and went to two very nice colleges. I believe he would be in the upper 1% like me. It only takes a knowledge of how and why the four psychologists made the test the way they did.
You have to think outside the box, not what a bunch of knee jerkers think (or mobs for that matter) who base their knowledge on what people are saying without knowing the whole truth.
2006-06-19 10:25:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by madbaldscotsman 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would score 200..........but only after paying off the Supreme Court like he did in the 2000 Election.
(Scored honestly, he would probably have an IQ of -108.)
(Negative IQ points are the only way to account for him, i believe.)
2006-06-19 11:04:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by missinglincoln 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think about a 250. Why? He is smart enough to dupe the American people into electing him (not by popular vote, but by electoral college but whatever), and not once, but TWICE. He also has the itellectual prowess to carry out a task (a war) that clearly is unfinished business of his father's. And I hope I don't see this come true but he is posturing for his dear brother Jeb to inherent his seat on the throne of the Bush monarchy.
2006-06-19 10:30:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think that george bush would have a gooe enough score because in order to care enough for a country, he would need a good iq. but due to the way he has been acting and the decisions he has been making lately ... probably 2...maybe 2.5. maybe . lol
2006-06-19 10:23:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
57
2006-06-19 10:22:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by curious 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is not a fair question! You have to be able to read in order to take an IQ test!
2006-06-19 10:29:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by angelpockets 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
66
2006-06-19 10:22:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
He would probably score something like dumber then a monkey probably like a -100 to the second power.
2006-06-19 10:57:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋