Why is it that Bush doesn't get assassinated for the bad stuff she does when the good people get assassinated for doing good. Lincoln did nothing wrong, but got assassinated anyway. Bush has done nothing good, but hasn't gotten assassinated. Why is this so?
2006-06-19 08:07:43 · 30 answers · asked by the Politics of Pikachu 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well this is an interesting question! Although life without Bush might seem like a good idea it just might be better for us to wait for the next Presidential Election to see that come true. Why do I say that, Cheney. Do we really want him as a President? Just wait for the next Election and then we can have one big White House shake-ep without all the blood!
2006-06-19 08:22:24 · answer #1 · answered by hamlet_girl_21 2 · 6⤊ 2⤋
President Bush hasn't been assassinated because he is NOT some third-world tin-pot dictator who has declared himself to be "President for Life." We have elections and term limits on the Presidency. (Please save all the rhetorical BS about stolen elections for another day.) The good stuff and bad stuff are subjective. One man's good is another man's tyranny. John Wilkes Booth was part of a conspiracy that wanted Lincoln dead because he preserved the Union and emancipated the slaves.
A word of caution: The subject of the assassination of a President can be a dangerous one. If you say the wrong thing, you could end up talking to the Secret Service with NO First Amendment protection.
2006-06-19 08:49:15 · answer #2 · answered by Radio Spy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'm easily no longer a Bush fan. thus, even however, Bush truly has no longer something to do with something. Ahmadinejad is an elected chief of state. he's coming right here with the aid of fact he's adressing the UN this is placed in massive apple city. Bush has no authority to attempt him or supply him amnesty. that should take a worldwide court docket. If Bush tried to make any militant attempt to seize or assassinate him, he could be to blame of a criminal offense.
2016-10-31 03:28:10 · answer #3 · answered by holliway 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hold George bush in great esteem.He is a strong leader and believes in taking bull by the horns. The menace of terrorism has no place in the present day world where all matters can be resolved in a civilized way. Needless to say the damage terrorists can cause.9/11 was a sample and caused enough pain. What if if a mad person blinded of all senses by the piosonous indoctrination he receives day in and out succeeds in getting hold of an atomic device and explodes it in Times Square? You can well imagine the damage it can cause. We will then be praying for George Bush rather than discussing why was he not assassinated! Terrorists have no religion, morals or compassion. They need to be dealt with using set of rules very different from those in a civil society!Some day the world will wake up to this grim reality!
2006-06-19 08:46:35 · answer #4 · answered by openpsychy 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because it is a crime to assassinate anyone for any reason whatsoever. Anyone who does that is a criminal.
It depends on history to decide if President Bush is a good president or a bad president.
I am extremely concerned that you are posting such an inflamatory and sick question.
2006-06-19 08:16:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You try being president you idiot!! I'm sure the job sucks a great deal. Yes, Bush has done some not so good things but think of all the stuff that he has done that has been good for this wonderful country we live in. If you think Bush is so bad why don't you pack your stuff and move to another country. Try Iraq they shoot people. You should be ashamed and not even call yourself American!!
2006-06-19 08:24:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He is too protected, if you notice, he never speaks anywhere people are. He hides in his lair in Crawford or at military bases where all attendees are screened heavily.
During his inauguration people pelted his car with eggs making the driver speed away. The only time in history this has happened.
Everyone hates this guy, but he doesn't act alone, in fact he had little to no input into the Iraq War. The people who planned it such as James Baker III or Richard Perle are more to blame, not to mention the CEOs of major oil companies... they are to blame far more and they are less guarded... so it is just a matter of people understanding who to direct their anger at.
Thank God for them we have what is called "television" to keep people concentrating on everything but what matters to their lives. Caring about Britney's hissy-fit or Brad Pitts ***-hair.
I mean, it is foolish, no matter if you are liberal or conservative or neither, people in the USA must wake up and get educated on the facts of the matter.
2006-06-19 08:15:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because we don't handle problems the way they did when Lincoln was president.
My question would be and is: Why hasn't Bush been impeached for what he has done and is doing to this country?
2006-06-19 08:16:14 · answer #8 · answered by Meg 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Look, I understand you think people who disagree with you should be killed, but that's not how it works in society. If you don't like what an elected politician does, then vote him out. If you lose the election, the answer isn't a gun. You just have to accept the fact you lost.
Please grow up. Violence is for the ignorant.
2006-06-19 08:23:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because people are just too afraid to have Cheney assume the presidency when Bush dies.
2006-06-19 08:10:38 · answer #10 · answered by carole 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋