do you think they will make unisex panties so all can wear so theres no discimination?

Answer 1

Unisex undergarments are already in existence. It is just that for the comfort of "closed-minded" individuals they divide the stock between the men's and women's section of the store. That is also the way that stores purchase them. You just have to know what you are looking for and how to word your inquiry to sales representatives.

Answer 2

Maybe as recently as 20 years ago, the discrimination was much more acute, but I believe that it is indeed fading--a good thing. More and more guys--otherwise "macho"--are not as bothered by wearing "soft stuff" on their bods; they're actually discovering the sensuous delights on what they've been missing out on, for the past 100-odd years, since the advent of all those tickleiscious tricot-typed fabrics. Why let only chicks, have all of that fun???? Chicks--at least the broad-minded ones--actually may very well welcome significant others who wear softer stuff along with them, alongside of them. It can certainly cut down on the time spent on foreplay, and the tactile and visual effects of those fabrics can enhance the foreplay, too.

I think the final barriers to be broken down, regarding undies differences between the genders, probably concerns the amount of support that a given style, fabric, and brand provides a person's privates, disregarding a given person's gender, though, for that certain time of month, a gal obviously wants that extra measure of security and hygiene. Otherwise, possibly anything goes.

If someone is not especially concerned about support and "safe" immobilization of their privates, conceivably more fabric could be added to the tailoring of undies--especially the front panels of the undies in question. In fact, I prefer the additional fabric provided from the rear panels of both guys' and gals' extra-soft fuller-briefed undies, more room for my privates to "do a dance", as they're enjoying the ministrations of that fabric. So, to solve the "problems" of tailoring, I will separate the back panels, from the front panels of two identical pair, and splice/sew the two backs together, along with a slightly enlarged gusset. You know? This garment, which I call "bilaterally symmetrical", it really does not make a whit of difference, either, whether it's worn "forwards", nor "backwards", because it's all the same, a little more fullness in the gussie; throughout the tops of the thighs; and a more relaxed caress of the bum. Visually, I think that this design adds a little more "mystery", too. Things need not always be visually immediately explicit--a build-up can possibly provide more excitement and satisfaction to one's playtimes.

Answer 3

the only reason for the difference in close fitting underwear is because of the physical difference.

but there is a unisex form of loose underwear called boxer shorts.

Answer 4

No if you wear panties you are going to be discriminated against if it is discovered. Regardless of if it is uni-sexed or not. Also how would the fact that they are uni sexed be enough to feed your fetish anyway.

never mind I don't want to know.

Answer 5

they are called bikini cut, and of course thongs. Victoria's secret sells some ladies panties that are solid colored, and they don't look unlike the solid colored male counterparts, you could always wear those, i guess. check out fredrick's of hollywood, they make undies for men and women, many of them look alike...

Answer 6

Boxers...good for everyone...I agree with the thong too...but seems a bit more uncomfortable for men.

Answer 7

what is wrong with wearing panties,i do all the time,besides if you have pants on who will know?

Answer 8

Why, looking forward to shopping for them without being embarassed anymore?

Answer 9

Wear what feels comfy. Besides, you should be in charge of who sees your undies.

Answer 10

no I don't think "they" will, so maybe you should make the unisex panties.