2006-06-19 05:52:44 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
Leonardo DiCaprio. He's so much more appealing physically, youthfully, more talent, and Leo has better morally.
Physically, Leo's younger ... has better facial features ... a better body frame ... and those eyes (dreamy).
Talent ... well Leo has the Oscar, that Tom's coveting and despiratly trying to get. Which, Tom's coveting isn't too attractive ... while Leo's humility is very appealing.
Morally, Leo's never been divorced. He shows a respect for himself and those around him. Cruise is pushing his lifestyle and believes on strangers like Brook Shields (such an ugly trait he's showing). Plus, Tom's been divorced (not an appealing trait for a man). OK, Leo is pushing the "Tree-Hugger" on people, but he does so with humility and in a way that shows us that it is for our benefit; which saving our environment is really saving ourselves!!!
2006-06-19 07:15:25 · answer #1 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Tom Cruise
2006-06-21 17:10:41 · answer #2 · answered by tbear 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Cruise
2006-06-19 12:58:48 · answer #3 · answered by squrrelfeeder@yahoo.com 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Cruise
2006-06-19 12:56:15 · answer #4 · answered by chocolate smoke 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Di Caprio!
2006-06-19 12:56:34 · answer #5 · answered by hotwheelswd31 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Cruise; im into hot older men. There a lot more experienced.
2006-06-23 15:00:27 · answer #6 · answered by mayrad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have said hands down Tom Cruise...but he's lost his mind when he jumped on Oprah's couch...it just ain't the same.
Never really cared for Leo...so
I'm gonna have to say Orlando Bloom!
2006-06-19 15:41:17 · answer #7 · answered by Starwyn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leonardo DiCaprio
2006-06-19 12:56:52 · answer #8 · answered by divapowergirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tom cruise
2006-06-19 12:55:23 · answer #9 · answered by Omer S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought Tom was after Top Gun. But really to me the all time cutest are Paul Newman and Robert Redford.
2006-06-23 19:59:31 · answer #10 · answered by Wise Old Witch 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋