English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

yeah, i am sure all of the non-christian religions that make up this country would vote for him. NOT!!! :))

2006-06-19 05:22:15 · answer #1 · answered by thunder2sys 7 · 4 5

Although Billy Graham tends to be less of a zealot than most televangelists, I still would not him as president. I would prefer to have someone who is more experienced in foreign affairs, the workings of government, diplomacy, etc.

He could be a good communicator and good with people, but that's not enough - look at the mess that Reagan created!

I think most presidents we elect have strong religious beliefs - at least that's what their campaigns tend to say. But I would be uncomfortable with a career religious person. Yes, Pat Robertson and Jerry "the loon" Falwell, I'm talking to you! :o)

2006-06-19 12:24:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Mr Graham is too intelligent to take the job. He's also no longer in the best of health. With Presidents Eisenhower and Regan not so long ago I hesitate to say he's too old.

2006-06-19 12:32:43 · answer #3 · answered by OldGringo 7 · 0 0

Uhmmm. . . Billy Graham is quite elderly and in very fragile health. Beyond any ideological issues anyone might have with him being president, the act of RUNNING for president would probably kill him.

2006-06-19 12:21:29 · answer #4 · answered by shovelbum_mud_lover 4 · 0 0

Yes I know and the Vice President could be Pat Robertson, that is a swell idea. I think the christian base would be very happy with this idea.

2006-06-19 12:28:49 · answer #5 · answered by se_roddy 3 · 0 0

Do you not realize that he is an entertainer, he has gotten rich selling you god. No one should get rich from God. It is just wrong. He would make an awful president mostly because he is old and sickly. His idea's would not be good for freedom in America, either.

2006-06-19 13:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So, you are all for theocracy? I'm not, I think theocracy is a terrible way to rule the masses, let alone a country that claims to be a democracy.

2006-06-19 12:48:57 · answer #7 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 0 0

No in a million years. TRUSTWORTHY??????????? I dont think so. He would sell out to the liberals. They then would run this country into the ground.

2006-06-19 12:21:18 · answer #8 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0 0

Bad idea. Don't need ANYONE pushing religiuos ideals on us.

2006-06-19 12:20:28 · answer #9 · answered by alieneddiexxx 4 · 0 0

he is to smart to be the president

2006-06-19 12:20:42 · answer #10 · answered by cmhurley64 6 · 0 0

lets see....

a religious nut case running the country.....

isn't that what we have now?

2006-06-19 13:54:51 · answer #11 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers