English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-19 03:58:00 · 24 answers · asked by Brandon M 2 in Sports Wrestling

24 answers

Yes

2006-06-24 19:31:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think TNA sadly enough. ECW only has RVD, Kurt Angle, and Big Show. TNA has a lot of stars that I would like to see in WWE. The only thing I don't like about TNA is the ring. The fact that the ring is so small it makes it look like every single step in that ring is planned out. Some matches look like buffed up dance routines. If TNA had more money and a large platform to perform on, they very well could give WWE a run for their money.

2006-06-19 05:00:28 · answer #2 · answered by average_joe397 4 · 0 0

If it was still the original ECW it would be no contest but since the new ECW-light is out now , I would say TNA is a much better product. If McMahon would give Heyman total control ECW still might be something good.

2006-06-19 04:52:21 · answer #3 · answered by Railr0ader 4 · 0 0

I'll be honest... TNA is by far greater is superiority.... ECW has sold out to the WWE and is just another faction. There is Raw, Smackdown, and ECW... I acknowledge the fact that the old ECW HAD all of those classic hardcore matches, but they lacked in one thing... character. Sure you can watch someone get the **** kicked out of them or beaten with a baseball bat surrounded by barbed wire, but why not go where it's balanced and see it all? If you're just concerned with the most brutality, then go get Backyard Brawls or something to that nature or simply watch UFC. There is no story there at all, just pure *** kicking. There... question solved...

2006-06-19 07:04:54 · answer #4 · answered by wfk_dodger 1 · 0 0

ECW

Because it original extreme wrestling @ its purest form. Plus, ECW has more length and memorable matches then weak azz TNA. Finally, almost everyone on TNA has ECW background and trainning.

2006-06-19 10:46:39 · answer #5 · answered by missionman1914 4 · 0 0

Well since Sting is the main writer for TNA and all the themes seem to go well, I would say TNA Vince needs to rethink his whole creative aspect or loose alot of fans and Money... Or he will just buy TNA like he has bought everythng else.

2006-06-19 09:31:22 · answer #6 · answered by romntcsongbrd 1 · 0 0

definitely ecw although tna has a very good list of talented wrestlers as well as experienced wrestlers but they lack good story lines whereas ecw is better

2006-06-19 06:55:24 · answer #7 · answered by Ameer M 1 · 0 0

I think they are both equally great. ECW has all the hardcore blood matches. and TNA has all the action and great wrestling. So I like them both!

2006-06-19 04:28:59 · answer #8 · answered by Angel52186 3 · 0 0

tna is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to fake, but ecw sucks so wwe.!!

2006-06-19 07:14:30 · answer #9 · answered by bentessa k 4 · 0 0

ecw

2006-06-19 04:23:20 · answer #10 · answered by ageking20 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers