English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have long noted that mutual fund advetisements show the "effect of charges"(the weasel name for the manager's cut), after 1,3,5 & 10 years but never, beyond that. I also noted that not only does the sum take by the manager increases with time, but also the % age. So I decided to calculate how much they take in the longer term. After all, the government keeps extorting us to save for our old age. My findings were as follows:

If a mutual fund grow at an average rate of 6% pa and has a front load of,say, 5%, and annual charges(TER) 2% the manager's cut (effect of charges)is:
After 1yr 7%
After 5yrs 14%
After 10yrs 22%
After 20yrs 36%
After 40yrs 57%

The load & annual charges assumed in this example are common in UK. In the US they are lower, but do let me assure you that the results are only a little less shocking. Is it any wonder they never show us the figures after 10 years? Still want to invest in mutual funds? Well, there is a fool born every day,as they say.

2006-06-19 03:15:38 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Business & Finance Investing

6 answers

There was a relatively famous study about how around 75% of the actively managed mutual funds underperform the corresponding index after taking into account the management fees. I'm not familiar with the UK area, but in the US, I'm more for just investing in the indices with some of those ultra low cost index funds. Or just an ETF as they have comparable costs.

It's a big industry, though, so of course, they want to charge as much as they can get away with.

2006-06-19 03:30:20 · answer #1 · answered by Arbitrage 7 · 0 2

Hi there,
You should try with Penny Stocks Trading (you can find more info here: http://pennystocks.toptips.org )

Penny stocks, also known as cent stocks in some countries, are common shares of small public companies that trade at low prices per share.
I've been subscribing to this PennyStock web site for about a year now and have loved the objective advice they give. He really does look for quality stocks and I've made some pretty nice profits on a lot of his suggestions. Being still fairly new to investing I have been dabbling a lot in penny stocks to try and grow my account. I may not have a big account, but it's a lot bigger than it was a year ago. On just one of Nathan's picks this year I managed to make my investment back ten-fold! Be careful! Penny stocks are notoriously risky but if you follow the right method the risk is almost 0. I suggest to invest only little money first and then reinvest the profits. This is the site I'm using: http://pennystocks.toptips.org
Hope it helps.

2014-09-22 06:09:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. Be the passenger or the pilot. Just don't be both. Why would you want to hang on in there for there ride with your fund manager when you can withdraw from the account and make a better return on the proceeds? 44% is good, but that's not hard to achieve since March 9. You've got to believe in your trading system when the going gets rough like in 2002 and 2008. By playing it down on winning streaks, I rebound more mentally and financially strongly from losing streaks. It's like the sports psychology of being an elite professional athlete getting into the zone. In this case, the trading zone. There are entire books written about trading psychology.

2016-05-20 02:11:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your numbers are way off.

The front load is a one time carge. Many funds are no-load funds.

The annual fee is more like 0.50% -- not 2%.

Yes, mutual funds usually underperform the index they match because of transaction costs -- but for most individuals the benefits of diversification that a mutual fund offers more than makes up for this loss. Most people cannot afford to have a well diversified portfolio on their own.

2006-06-19 06:02:09 · answer #4 · answered by Ranto 7 · 0 0

Yes I still want to invest in mutual funds. What you say is true about many mutual funds, but we do have some low fee accounts here in the U.S. I have money in the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (Admiral) with a 0.09% annual fee. I am less knowledgeable with U.K. funds, but there is a MoneyBuilder UK Index Fund at Fidelity with a 0.3% annual fee. Both funds have no initial fee. (It has been pointed out, however, that Fidelitity's fee has been higher in the past, and its current fee may be a short lived teaser rate.)
I will say that the U.K. does seem to have overall higher annual fees than the U.S.

2006-06-19 04:00:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you make informed decisions and approach your penny stock investments with the same thoroughness that you’d use in your other investments, you too can unlock a whole lot of profit potential. Learn here https://tr.im/hXhxZ

It’s absolutely true that penny stock investors can make very quick gains. Synutra International, Inc. (NASDAQ: SYUT) is a great example of a penny stock. This dairy-based, nutritional-products company has jumped from a little Bulletin Board operation to a billion dollar corporation. The company finally graduated from Over-the-Counter status to the NASDAQ Stock Market bringing with it 113% gains in less than two months.

This happens all the time and it’s how some of the best investors in the world became the richest investors in the world. Buying some shares for pennies on the dollar and selling at $10 or $20 is possibly the fastest way from being a hobby investor to a super investor

2016-02-15 22:47:35 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers