2006-06-19 03:07:04 · 9 answers · asked by molly 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
no legs. got to open my beer.
2006-06-19 03:10:16 · answer #1 · answered by Kismet 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No Legs, Easier to put wheels under than to attach arms above.
2006-06-19 03:13:34 · answer #2 · answered by F. M. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
oh i'd rather have no arms! Cause wouldn't want to get pushed about in a wheelchair if i could help it!! also means you could have a shower and stuff - oh but how would you wash your hair! oh dear! Tough question Molly!!!!!
2006-06-19 03:35:51 · answer #3 · answered by Saz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No legs. I can get mobility for the lower portion. I want to be able to feed myself.
2006-06-19 03:10:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would chose to have no legs. I am lazy and never go anywhere anyway.
2006-06-19 03:12:04 · answer #5 · answered by zenan p 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
interesting question...made me think for a while.....no legs it would be....ther is atleast the solution of using a wheelchair!
2006-06-20 03:55:21 · answer #6 · answered by Olive Oyl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no legs
2006-06-19 03:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by fuilui213 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no legs......not sure I want to eat with my feet
2006-06-19 03:10:43 · answer #8 · answered by allison_smith0 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
both
2006-06-19 03:10:06 · answer #9 · answered by mrgadmail 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋