2006-06-19 02:30:15 · 36 answers · asked by pugsly 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He is already
2006-06-19 02:32:57 · answer #1 · answered by Paul 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No George W. Bush is already President of United State of America if his the head of UK goverment. Let me explane in UK the Head of Government is a Prime Minister and in U.S.A. President. George W. Bush must be part of Royal Family in U.K. like in World War 2 Prime Minister Winston Churchill is Part of Royal Family and Tito Churchill the son of Winston Churchill. Tito became a General of British Army. That's the rule of the Royal Family must part of the Royal Family then Bush can't be a Head Government of U.K. his not part of Royal Family.
2006-06-19 02:55:00 · answer #2 · answered by MIngfang47 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If given a choice between that, and being in the EU, I would much prefer that this country was the 51st state of the USA (not necessarily under George Bush, I always thought Ronald Reagan was your best ever president in my lifetime) rather than be tied to the EU. Mr Gorbachev (ex-Soviet leader) once asked why does any country in continental Europe (including the British Isles) want to tie themselves to what is effectively a modern day manifestation of the Soviet Union. And THIS from a communist!
2006-06-19 11:58:58 · answer #3 · answered by TrueBrit 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I thought he was already unofficially anyway.
Anything Blair decides that the U.K will do is always exactly what Bush wants us to do.
Bush tells Blair what to do and Blair does it.
Blair has been a huge disappointment, the only people he has improved life for is single parents, even very low paid couples are worse off under Blair, I wont even start on the N.H.S, dentists, council tax, schools etc
2006-06-19 02:45:01 · answer #4 · answered by madamspud169 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George W Bush shouldn't even be in charge of his own teeth.
OK, so Tony's despicable. But at least he has a brain of sorts. I read somewhere that GWB's IQ was 89. If this is true (and I find it quite believable) what were americans thinking for voting him in in the first place? I have cats that have a higher IQ.
2006-06-19 02:40:47 · answer #5 · answered by Patchouli Pammy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, George W. Bush should give head to the UK government.
That was not a typo.
2006-06-19 02:53:45 · answer #6 · answered by Made in America 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I already know some people who casually accept the concept of George Bush as "Our President". I sometimes think the media and even the education system is trying to knock peoples brains into neutral. I know that's what religion's for.
2006-06-19 02:45:58 · answer #7 · answered by Frog Five 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George w bush should not be the head of any government he is not trustworthy
2006-06-19 15:54:34 · answer #8 · answered by vferrino_08 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George W Bush is even more stupid/thicker than the idiot of UK people are saddled with now. Why trade one idiot for another?
2006-06-19 02:35:44 · answer #9 · answered by k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Quite seriously, he would be unelectable in the UK. We are, after all, a liberal democracy with no history of religious fervency, so I suspect Bush would actually struggle even to lead the Tory party...
2006-06-19 02:35:06 · answer #10 · answered by eriverpipe 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George bush shouldn't be in charge of a flock of sheep, let alone a country.
2006-06-19 02:34:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋