English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

do u think she was killed by mi5 cause shes was pregnent with a half muslim baby (which u could sort of see why they would having a foreinger as royalty not being racist cause im not but there would of been a point) or that it WAS just a terrible accident what are your views???

2006-06-19 02:02:04 · 42 answers · asked by steve 2 in Society & Culture Royalty

42 answers

Some conspiracy theorists believe in something like this.
Diana, if not already, COULD have become pregnant and given birth to a Muslim child, and become converted to the Muslim faith herself. If this happened Diana COULD have influenced the religion of a future King, her son Prince William.
Which COULD have changed the balance of religion in Great Britain.
And as we all know, today the Monarch retains the title "Defender of the Faith" and is still the Supreme Governor of the Church of England.
The Church of England also has a law-making role in Britain. Twenty-six bishops (including the two Archbishops) sit in the House of Lords and are known as the Lords Spiritual. They are thought to bring a religious ethos to the secular process of law.
And to prevent a possible chain of events.... Well, you know the rest.
I don't believe in it myself, but then, it's their theory.

2006-06-23 12:11:05 · answer #1 · answered by Norman Bates 4 · 1 0

OOH! Ladies and Gentlemen, boys and girls. You better sit down for this.

Forget everything you think you know about that accident. Diana was not killed. The accident was real, and so were the other deaths. But not hers.

She survived. She was injured and taken to hospital and she was alive. She was taken, literally, behind closed doors and you and I and everyone else were TOLD she had died, but that's not what happened. She didn't die.

She already had wanted out of the whole circus. That was more than an idea. It was a plan. The accident, while tragic, was a perfect opportunity to put the plan into action. Since the accident was unexpected, it took a while to arrange but the media clampdown made it possible and the lady simply disappeared. The next time anyone outside the circle of those directly involved saw "Diana" she, herself, was long gone in a secret location in SE Asia. The body was a fake. A brilliantly convincing one but all it needed to do, after all, was look dead.

The scummy papers variously say they have pictures of her from the scene showing she had terrible injuries but they don't publish them out of respect, but that is laughable. Respect? These guys? The reason they dont publish these pictures is they don't HAVE pictures. They were all confiscated and if they showed anything it's that she wasn't badly hurt.

2006-06-20 07:07:34 · answer #2 · answered by Frog Five 5 · 0 0

When are people going to wake up to the real truth? She was a pretty face with a coy expression, see-through skirt and mental health problems from the beginning. It makes me furious that the media can manipulate the majority of the population with sensationalism, and the mass hysteria over her death is mainly their fault. HRH Princess Margaret had a very colourful life but she wasn't blazoned across the tabloids because she didn't act like a commoner, which Diana was. IMHO Diana was killed by her own deviousness, she got a little too clever, then not being able to keep up the act due to her mental state caused her own her demise.

2006-06-19 02:34:20 · answer #3 · answered by cymbalita 5 · 0 0

It was an accident.... I just people would just get over it, it's not as if we are still discussing the deaths of other members of the Royal familly.... I think te press hyped the whole thing to sell news papers and the fact that there are still serious questins being asked is more to do with the strength of Fleet Street than anything that MI5 could do....... Guve us all a break and let her and this this topic RIP

2006-06-19 02:07:23 · answer #4 · answered by break 5 · 0 0

I find the story about her accident ludicrous. The royal family just doesn't have accidents like that. do you hear of the queen being driven by a drunk, escaping from the paparazzi at MPH!
She must have been killed, why I'm not so sure, but suspect it was the Muslim think that, was just too much for someone to bear.

2006-06-19 06:13:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I believe that she was killed on orders of the Royal Family for years she had shown that how to act and before the people then that idiot Charles let her go because of that tart he is now with. Di was only wanted by the Royal Family for one reason to produce a blood line.
Just think how they would have reacted with the problems in the world today if she had given birth to a Muslim child.
100 % murder no matter how much they try and cover it up, but we will never know.

2006-06-19 04:26:07 · answer #6 · answered by ringo711 6 · 0 0

I believe she was murdered by the Royal Family as they thought she was pregnent to Dodi and didn't want the future king of England to have a half brother who wasn't white. After all, Prince Phillip is the most racist man ever...

2006-06-22 04:16:26 · answer #7 · answered by theallknowingscouser 3 · 0 0

Accident; accident; accident and what's more accident..... The fact that Mohammed Al Fayed can't believe his son was thick enough to get into a car with a half stoned idiot at the wheel and then plays kiss chase with motorcycles through the streets of Paris is his problem, not the world's.....

2006-06-19 02:21:16 · answer #8 · answered by eriverpipe 7 · 0 0

Although she might have been pregnant, she was taking lessons to become a Roman Catholic. Earl Spencer and his mother had already converted.

We may never know what happened in that tunnel, though the drunk driving thing seems a most likely answer. It certianly bolsters the whole 'mother's against drunk drivers' position.

But as we wait for William to assume the throne, it is common knowledge that once he is, Diana will again receive the title HRH, that ws removed when she divorced Charles.

2006-06-19 02:11:25 · answer #9 · answered by Bishop David F. Milne DD 3 · 0 0

How many times is the fact that she was nor pregnant have to be discussed. There was medical evidence which proved she absolutelt was not pregnant. Do you not read the news or do you skip straight to the scandal pages?
It was just a tragic accident caused by her driver drinking & driving, nothing more. Everyone these days seems to look for conspiracy in everything.
Get over it.

2006-06-20 07:16:50 · answer #10 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers