Well, you COULD double-major, depending what university/college you're attending and if they allow that. However, it's really what you have the greater passion, talent, and love for doing.
Neither industry/field of career is easy to "make it big" in. So either way, you'll be treading down the road to either making it or breaking it.
Also, there's a difference between having talent and having passion. Some people have both, some one or the other. You may have a passion for filmmaking, but the industry really cares whether or not you're good at it. By all means, I'm not trying to debase you or anything. I personally think that if you have a passion for filmmaking, go for it.
Another thing, having a degree in filmmaking doesn't necessarily guarantee anything. Most people within the film industry have degrees ranging from business to English to things even like Philosophy. As an alternate route, get a degree in theatre, but keep working on your love for filmmaking outside of your studies. Should you choose to give up filmmaking, you'd have the degree in theatre to fall back on. Hope this helps.
2006-06-19 03:55:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nic 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I actually have a bachelor's degree in Accounting. to bypass into that field, you quite desire the degree, plus further certification. although, for a field which includes filmmaking, distinctive the notably effective human beings have ranges in filmmaking, some do no longer. in case you prefer to modify careers with out returning to varsity, you'll desire to choose a field the position a level isn't required, or is non-obligatory. Alot of retail and eating position managers don't have any degree or a level in an unrelated field.
2016-10-14 07:24:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Theater is a good degree to have if you don't like working long hours. Filmmaking on the other hand is more fun but the hours are much longer and the tasks are always unpredictable in order to get the results that you are seeking.
2006-06-19 00:43:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joe K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Theater is immediate, live, connecting, no second takes, requires stamina and much memorization.
Film is more popular, can be edited, allows for different versions, is permanent, and is more financially rewarding.
Sir Ian McKellan does both, although his film income must be astronomical. He needs the immediate connection with the audience.
I believe that there are many more niches in filmmaking, employmentwise.
2006-06-19 01:35:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by helixburger 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
filmmaking two words : Spike Lee
2006-06-19 02:27:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Pimpin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Get a BA in film making and a Masters in business, then act in your own movie using someone else's money.
2006-06-19 00:47:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by f8f8f8f8 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
combine the two get a degree in teamaking
2006-06-19 00:50:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
theatre is much more interesting & needs more talent
2006-06-19 00:41:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋