In the last 4 years there are 8,000 fatal and non-fatal gang related shootings in L.A. California. Using the California's senators stand on Iraq should we pull all law enforcement out of LA immediately and let the gangs have it
2006-06-19 00:31:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
for the record 14 mo. southeast Asia(nam)
2006-06-22 01:21:49 · update #1
Wow -- didn't know it's been that many. Just watched a documentary on the "Arena" in Cali. All those inmates in that one place. The laws need to be more strick for gang activity (not all this revolving door craziness). Maybe the Terminator needs to kick butt!
2006-06-19 00:38:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Oh gee, lets see, California is a state within the United States and Iraq hasn't applied for statehood yet. Hmmmm Well lets see, what kind of mental midget would say such a thing, Oh I know, a dumb *** repuglican idiot. Dumb enough to vote for George Bush in the first place and even dumber for supporting him. No I say we stay in Ca. and matter of fact bring the people home and have them go to L.A. and protect the people there.
2006-06-19 08:08:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah see what it's like without an economy and the wild card the cops. Sometimes they are the deciding factor even if the statistics don't prove it. I think we should go old school were if they steal we cut off a hand etc.... jail doesn't help and some think it's a badge of honor. FK them all their all ignorant anyways!
2006-06-19 07:36:50 · answer #3 · answered by andrephoenix 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LA PD most likely live in LA, and come from California. They call that place home, their families, friends, job, future is there.
Gangs are under US and California law, they are criminals but their goal is not to have LA PD go back to their home, that is illogical.
US Soldiers are not Iraqi, they come from cities in the US.
Using the logic posed in your question the option is them coming back or never coming back........
Your question therefore is illogical.
Seriously.......even without a fixed date your the choice is between coming back and never coming back..........
even you can agree they have to come back.
2006-06-23 07:06:24 · answer #4 · answered by nefariousx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the democrats like to be soft on crime and criminals so I'm sure the gangs wouldn't mind contributing to their campaigns and if they given the LA area to rape and pillage the gangs would vote them in again.
2006-06-19 07:53:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think u r trying to act smart,while u r not,u dont know anything,
if u r man enough,why dont u go to IRAQ and fight there with ur army in the hot desert,instead of siting relax infront of ur comp and let ur friends die there,isnt that ur country fighting there?dont u support ur president ?or u cant do anything but talk and complain.
2006-06-20 04:35:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
And think before you speak. This is probably the most ignorant argument I've ever heard. And I've heard a lot of ignorance from you people.
2006-06-20 07:59:13 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have already served in combat(Vietnam), but I'll go again if you will. The silence is deafening. Need to change your underwear? You far right gun slingers are all hat and no cattle.
2006-06-22 06:56:09 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We should go to the U.N. first and then have a phased withdrawal.
2006-06-19 08:02:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋