Why can't republicans just admit that Bush is a failure?

Question

There is NO argument against BUSH, that can be won...NONE!
So why not be honest and admit he is a miserable, criminal failure?

Answer 1

Because they are slow learners who take the special bus to the school of experience.
Having literally gone around the world, I have encountered different cultures. There is one saying that I heard from one such old culture, that when the devil decides to destroy someone, he enters that person's head and makes sure that he listens to no one. He keeps feeding the person's arrogance and eggs him on, to his destruction.
The republicans' intolerance for opposing viewpoints seems to suggest to me that the devil has entered their heads.

Answer 2

That is total nonsense. No one person can admit or deny that the historical consequences of the Bush II administration is a failure or a success; only time and historical perspective can do that.

In the late 1960's young people felt passionately about Richard Nixon. The vitriol between college students and Richard Nixon was really bitter. And for good reason. The war in Viet Nam and the emergence of a youth majority in the United States made Nixon particularly despised.

Yet it was Richard NIxon who, by executive order, lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.

Some people think that history treats Richard Nixon too well. There was Watergate, there was the war in Vietnam. There was the corruption and eventual resignation of his Vice President, Spiro Agnew, for corruption. And the first President never elected to the office, Gerald Ford, took over the Presidency from him.

Notwithstanding, Nixon did some amazing things. He started the process of opening the door to China. What we used to call Red China. He started the process of democratizing China, despite some chaffing at the big by Chairman Mao. He lowered the voting age and he started de-escalating the war in Vietnam. Corruption was Richard Nixon's middle name. And Spiro Agnew isn't far behind him.

But in perspective, the young people who hated Nixon so much also had to grow up and pay taxes and they ended up being the most spoiled, hedonistic and self centered politicians in the history of the United States. Congress is full of the young people who answered the call to enter politics after Watergate. And, they are still there. All the Republicans, Democrats and all the wannabe's from 35 years ago are still all sitting in Congress to this day.

George Bush is not a miserable, criminal failure. He isn't miserable, his citizens are. And they are the ones who voted for him. And he isn't a criminal. He certainly didn't ask a little fat page into HIS office for a ********. And he didn't break the law as president.

I don't like the Bush administration, either. And I am certainly not a Republican. But your pallid accusations of criminal or miserable failure are baseless. In order to be a criminal, you have to break the law. He didn't do that. And to be miserable means that you have to be unhappy, or under a great deal of discomfort or distress. I would suggest that he is neither.

George Bush is a lame duck. He cannot run again. So it makes no difference. We just have to suck it up - all of us, and work to get someone in there who isn't as much of a fight instigator as Bush is.

Why don't you run for office? Get the old Republican geezer has beens from the past 30 years out of there altogether. Those guys, all of them Democrat and Republican alike are a bunch of baby boomer spoiled brats who have been there too long and have lived too well too long. They were the Woodstock generation, the free love generation and the live and let live generation until they figured out it didn't work and THEN they became conservative republicans. They are YOUR FOLKS, dude.

Time to grow up. If you want to call Bush names, be my guest. You can even come over to my house and we can make a voodoo doll out of straw and poke it's eyes out and burn it with matches and get it out of our systems.

But criminal he is not. And miserable, he is not.

Answer 3

Because that would mean to a certain degree that they were wrong and that they backed a failure, also it would cast a degree of doubt on the conservative beliefs that this president so fiercely supposedly believes in. No body likes to be wrong and most of these people find it easier to make believe that this president is on the right track rather than fess up the possibility that this president is an absolute screw up. It's like backing a really bad football team despite the fact that they suck, just because they are the home team.

Answer 4

It is called world view and ego. If they admit that Bush (the grandson of a Nazi sympathizer, the failed businessman, the AWOL from duty during Viet Nam, the drunken cokehead, the heartless frog killer, etc...) is a failure than by association they are failures. This is not acceptable to a person who has invested so much of their existence and belief system in this man that their egos would never survive the insanity that they will suffer from this belief.

Answer 5

Bush is not a failure, he is the official spokesman for
a company called CHUMAN.

half chimp half human. Bush was put in office as a publicity stunt. Since he took office Chuman coffe mugs and tee shirts are selling like hotcakes.

visit

www.heisnotaman orchimpheisachuman.com

Answer 6

Your premise is in basic terms undeniable incorrect. Please assessment the chart under. of direction you will see that the version between Bush and Obama's physique of techniques. permit me walk you alongside the direction of present day historic previous. follow alongside with the chart under. we initiate in 2000 with a money surplus. the concentration of the Bush administration is Social threat-loose practices Reform. Surplus keeps into 2001. yet then the 9/11 assaults ensue. the concentration of the country turns to threat-loose practices. 2002 we locate ourselves in a deficit. it truly is by making use of technique of each and every of the prospect-loose practices measures put in place and the creation of the dep. of place of initiate threat-loose practices. 2003 the conflict in Iraq resumes and the conflict in Afghanistan initiate. (with bipartisan help, i ought to upload). We see a spike interior the deficit. 2004 the Iraq conflict is in finished swing the deficit is at its height. Then making use of actuality the conflict winds down, we see a cut back interior the deficit beginning up in 2005 and continuing downward till 2008. yet then the financial disaster hits. The "fix" is the TARP bailout, with bipartisan help. yet, it truly is a one shot deal. The money for 2009 does not contain this expenditure. yet look on the deficit for 2009! What the heck? That, my chum is Obama's money. It does not contain any of the only time TARP payout. That already took place. it truly is in basic terms the doing of the Democrat great Majority and Obama. This reflects the Stimulus kit. yet optimum critically, there is truly no longer some thing quicker or later projections to even advise returning to stability. in actuality the White residing domicile's very own projections are for ever increasing deficits as a great way making use of actuality the chart is going. How could desire to each physique ever even advise that this financial disaster has some thing to do with Bush or the Republican party? How do you're making that bounce? I do in basic terms no longer see it. *

Answer 7

He has the POA over them...Money is their game and they will be beheaded if they talk out against him...Ok...So that is a lil ancient history stuff but he is a jerk from hell...Why are so many people chicken of that broke down train?...I can be honest with ya...Nothing hidden here...If he sees this and he doesn't like it and all you Bu-ll-sh-itter fans who don't like what I have to say then don't read it...You just need to get out and have a brain of your own...Because haven't you seen it?...He can't read, himself!...He reads books upside down!...Man, I wonder what his kids must have went through to get into school...Wait...Aren't they the drugheads and girls at the club getting arrested?...There are so many things that he and his family are corrupt of that I can't seem to remember all quite what they have done in order...He gets away with murder...And while in office since he can...Pardon anyone he wants...He taught his butt buddy Dick to murder without being prosecuted...HE GOT AWAY WITH THAT SHOOTING A GUY!...I guess he just better be happy that that guy did not have the chance to die...Oh well...If those fans of Bush just don't wise up after all that...YOU SUCK!...Just move to Mexico or Iraq or Iran so we can do away with you in our next hellatious and war filled presidency years...

Answer 8

Wanna bet?

Consider, just consider for a moment that Bush is right, just as Reagan was right. Reagan won the Cold War for us, but none of his contemporaries agreed with his approach. See the similarities?

Germany's SPIEGEL magazine shocked the world when it ran a cover page headline: COULD GEORGE W. BUSH BE RIGHT?

Here's how the article began:
Germany loves to criticize US President George W. Bush's Middle East policies -- just like Germany loved to criticize former President Ronald Reagan. But Reagan, when he demanded that Gorbachev remove the Berlin Wall, turned out to be right. Could history repeat itself?
------------------------------...

Look, I know you hate Bush. But consider for one moment how ironic history is. People thought Reagan was a fool. But it turned out that he was perhaps the only individual on the planet who could have ended the Cold War.

When the Middle East turns into a region of stable democracies, where women have the right to work and vote, will you still hate him?


http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,343378,00.html

Answer 9

Unfortunately, if you tell some people that you love God, hate abortion, love guns, and hate gays, that's enough to win their support. Also, Bush's supporters often watch Fox "News". A few years ago, a study actually proved that people who watched Fox "News" were more likely to be misinformed about the war in Iraq than people who depended on other news sources. Perhaps they just need to be deprogrammed.

Answer 10

Based upon what, the 4.7 unemployment rate, the fact that there have been zero terrorist attacks on the US since 9-11. What exactly is his failure that you speak of?