I don't know how it is for women but I can tell you how it is for a man. Last year I was cut and I can automatically can tell the difference. It is better to have more than less. A man loses sensation when he is cut. It will take a skilled woman who knows how to treat her man to make up for the difference.
2006-06-20 12:01:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by lamantia2676 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have been married to an uncircumcised man for almost 40 years and put this in Ripley's Believe it or Not, I have never had sex with another man and would never have wanted to! Life is good.! Sex is good! I would not recommend shopping around it might shorten your life to enjoy good sex.
2006-06-18 17:47:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by afriendlydaisy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i have no difference but the uncircumcised guy was the best i ever had
2006-06-18 17:35:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by misha h 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have had both, and I prefer a guy to be "cut". The ridge around the head of a penis, is very sensitive, and very sexy. I can feel that ridge, and stimulate that ridge, both orally and otherwise. When a guy is "un-cut", that ridge is covered.
2006-06-18 17:43:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by persnickety1022 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i prefer circumcised
2006-06-18 17:45:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋