English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

I don't know how it is for women but I can tell you how it is for a man. Last year I was cut and I can automatically can tell the difference. It is better to have more than less. A man loses sensation when he is cut. It will take a skilled woman who knows how to treat her man to make up for the difference.

2006-06-20 12:01:32 · answer #1 · answered by lamantia2676 1 · 0 0

I have been married to an uncircumcised man for almost 40 years and put this in Ripley's Believe it or Not, I have never had sex with another man and would never have wanted to! Life is good.! Sex is good! I would not recommend shopping around it might shorten your life to enjoy good sex.

2006-06-18 17:47:54 · answer #2 · answered by afriendlydaisy 3 · 0 0

yes i have no difference but the uncircumcised guy was the best i ever had

2006-06-18 17:35:29 · answer #3 · answered by misha h 1 · 0 0

I have had both, and I prefer a guy to be "cut". The ridge around the head of a penis, is very sensitive, and very sexy. I can feel that ridge, and stimulate that ridge, both orally and otherwise. When a guy is "un-cut", that ridge is covered.

2006-06-18 17:43:23 · answer #4 · answered by persnickety1022 7 · 0 0

i prefer circumcised

2006-06-18 17:45:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers