whoooooooo
2006-06-18 16:29:51 · 6 answers · asked by Sgt. Fletcher 3 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
For pure evil, I would give Hitler an edge over Stalin. Hitler's genocidal zeal is unmatched. Stalin's ruthlessness, and death toll exceeds Hitler. For pure numbers, Mao is the very worst. He may not have been as genocidal as Hitler, but Mao's contempt for his own people (seeing them as mere numbers) is staggering. During the Great Leap Forward alone, 30 million people starved to death. Mao didn't care in the least. He saw it as an experiment that didn't work out, and the losses were just collateral damage, to use a phrase that we hear a lot of nowadays. Osama Bin Laden isn't even in the same league as these guys.
2006-06-18 17:20:09 · answer #1 · answered by Lionel Hutz 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Probably Stalin, althought Mao killed about the same amount. Stalin was more cruel tho. Hitler is the most notorius, but killed far less.
2006-06-19 01:22:26 · answer #2 · answered by jack f 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hitler, he is the worst of all the worst, right next to the devil.
He wanted to take over the intire world! To kill everyone that doesnt love him and is willing to do everything for him.
Bad man.
2006-06-18 23:34:11 · answer #3 · answered by john h 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Among the 4, I'll say Hitler.
But if no answer given, I'll say the Japanese during WW2, see what have they done to the Chinese. They kill for fun and competition!
2006-06-19 22:02:51 · answer #4 · answered by mailtoloh 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All these and there are are many more to be included in this list.
2006-06-19 06:25:53 · answer #5 · answered by dharap123 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stalin
2006-06-19 00:58:50 · answer #6 · answered by nelent01 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋