As soon as the show went on a six week hiatus in the winter I knew it was in trouble. then they put the show on a different night and time. They set the show up for failure. I read somewhere it was creative differences as far as the story lines were concerned - to focus on the rivary between the President and the Speaker of the House or more toward the first family issues. Unfortunately, I guess in the long run it did not matter.
2006-06-18 14:49:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by rogue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Low Ratings
2006-06-18 14:45:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by gerbil31603 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It obviously made some sexist idiots nervous, it was a hit and put the idea in peoples heads of a great woman in the Oval Office...which this country desperately needs. Guess she was making Bush look like chump...or is that chimp????
2006-06-18 14:47:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by MadforMAC 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was actually an interesting show and it probably was to controversial for the public. I thought it was a great show (what can I say politics intrigue me) and I was upset when they moved it. With all the talk of Hilary Clinton, you'd think they'd have kept it.
2006-06-18 14:48:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Business decision.
2006-06-18 14:45:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by wildrover 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not surprised, it wasn't a very good show and i think Geena Davis is kind of annoying.
2006-06-18 14:45:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ally 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know, that was a very intelligent show, the same cannot be said about ABC.
2006-06-18 14:45:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by avonmarissa19 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It just did not get enough people to watch it. i thought it was a good show but?????
2006-06-18 14:47:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by mitchellwheckman 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
http://www.funnyjunk.com/pages/watch.htm
2006-06-18 14:43:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by KHB 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
bad timing... we all just got sick of the west wing and cic is too similar... too bad.
2006-06-18 14:45:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Matthew C 2
·
0⤊
0⤋