2006-06-18 14:37:12 · 13 answers · asked by professional student 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Well, they should both be consenting HUMAN adults. They should both be mentally capable. So long's it don't involve unwilling spectators, or physical harm, go for it! I don't care what's done in private.
2006-06-18 22:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Here's a good story: Ohio man convicted of sexual battery for having CONSENSUAL sex with his 22 year-old stepdaughter (no blood relation). This was based on a carelessly written law that presumes that when a step parent has sex with a step child, there is no consent as a result of the power dynamic- which is probably true in most cases but 22??!! Shockingly, the appeals court rejected his consitutional challenge; the case is now pending before the Ohio Supreme Court
http://www.cantonrep.com/topFive.php?vote=2&Headline=Ex-deputy+to+challenge+state+sex+law&ID=265807&Category=9
2006-06-18 16:04:47 · answer #2 · answered by Top 99% 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are medical reasons for 1st and 2nd level family members to not procreate = high percentage of disformity due to... (long medical words about the blood enzymes etc... that I read once) So, I would say there should be laws against that.
I don't think there should be any other laws against other consenting sex as long as it is between adults.
2006-06-18 14:46:07 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you support the Patriot Act, by any chance?
Why would anyone want a law to come inside of your bedroom. Can you imagine enforcing such a law.
2006-06-18 14:41:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it variety of feels out of step with different western international locations --- as to what it is going to likely be then this is an argument for the first public to settle on and sure its a sturdy ingredient that there are regulations with the aid of fact there'll constantly be people seeking to exploit inexperience
2016-10-31 02:40:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, and any such law would be unconstitutional according to the ruling in Lawrence v. Texas.
2006-06-18 17:30:22 · answer #6 · answered by James 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe anyone should be able to tell me what to do in my own home. Who are they to tell me I can't do something "in my own home"? We are not robots, and we are not controlled by anyone. Who actually enters a home to tell you your in violation of code 56403544-ab-sd445-blah-blah, wrong position?
2006-06-18 14:45:11 · answer #7 · answered by strizzaight_trippin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
personally i think they shouldn't have sex unless they are married but it would be hard to make that a law.
2006-06-18 14:43:37 · answer #8 · answered by stewbiscit 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some states do. No. I won't degrade my intelligence or yours with an explanation why.
2006-06-18 14:42:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I take if two adult what two pee, burn, and each other that is there business.
2006-06-18 17:00:48 · answer #10 · answered by PantsStatusZero 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋