The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments only prohibit discrimination by government bodies. They do not apply to private organizations. It is within the rights of private organizations to discriminate on the basis of gender, race, national origin and religion. What general limits, if any, would you impose on the discriminatory acts of private organizations?
2006-06-18 14:02:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
The answer is no, private organizations can not discriminate on the basis of gender, race, national origin and religion.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin;
the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (EPA), which protects men and women who perform substantially equal work in the same establishment from sex-based wage discrimination;
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), which protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older;
Title I and Title V of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), which prohibit employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, and in state and local governments;
Sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibit discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities who work in the federal government; and
the Civil Rights Act of 1991, which, among other things, provides monetary damages in cases of intentional employment discrimination
2006-06-18 16:56:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Private organizations need the government to stay out of their business. The jude media has made demons out of one race of people and have made every attempt to keep said people from organizing and confronting the same problems that have plagued mankind since the beginning of civilization. This is not descrimination, it`s fact!
Could it be that Jews are just nasty people? Is it a problem with EVERY OTHER PEOPLE of the world or is it a problem with Jews? Places that got fed up with Jews include
Year - Place
1. 250: Carthage
2. 415: Alexandria
3. 554: Diocese of Clement (France)
4. 561: Diocese of Uzzes (France)
5. 612: Visigoth Spain
6. 642: Visigoth Empire
7. 855: Italy
8. 876: Sens
9. 1012: Mayence
10. 1181: France
11. 1290: England
12. 1306: France
13. 1348: Switzerland
14. 1349: Hielbronn (Germany)
15. 1349: Hungary
16. 1388: Strasbourg
17. 1394: Germany
18. 1394: France
19. 1422: Austria
20. 1424: Fribourg & Zurich
21. 1426: Cologne
22. 1432: Savory
23. 1438: Mainz
24. 1439: Augsburg
25. 1446: Bavaria
26. 1453: Franconis
27. 1453: Breslau
28. 1454: Wurzburg
29. 1485: Vincenza (Italy)
30. 1492: Spain
31. 1495: Lithuania
32. 1497: Portugal
33. 1499: Germany
34. 1514: Strasbourg
35. 1519: Regensburg
36. 1540: Naples
37. 1542: Bohemia
38. 1550: Genoa
39. 1551: Bavaria
40. 1555: Pesaro
41. 1559: Austria
42. 1561: Prague
43. 1567: Wurzburg
44. 1569: Papal States
45. 1571: Brandenburg
46. 1582: Netherlands
47. 1593: Brandenburg, Austria
48. 1597: Cremona, Pavia & Lodi
49. 1614: Frankfort
50. 1615: Worms51. 1619: Kiev
52. 1649: Ukraine
53. 1654: LittleRussia
54. 1656: Lithuania
55. 1669: Oran (North Africa)
56. 1670: Vienna
57. 1712: Sandomir
58. 1727: Russia
59. 1738: Wurtemburg
60. 1740: Little Russia
61. 1744: Bohemia
62. 1744: Livonia
63. 1745: Moravia
64. 1753: Kovad (Lithuania)
65. 1761: Bordeaux
66. 1772: Jews deported to the Pale of Settlement (Russia)
67. 1775: Warsaw
68. 1789: Alace
69. 1804: Villages in Russia
70. 1808: Villages & Countrysides (Russia)
71. 1815: Lubeck & Bremen
72. 1815: Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria
73. 1820: Bremes
74. 1843: Russian Border Austria & Prussia
75. 1862: Area in the U.S. under Grant's Jurisdiction
76. 1866: Galatz, Romania
77. 1919: Bavaria (foreign born Jews)
78. 1938-45: Nazi Controlled Areas
79. 1948: Arab Countries
80. ????: USA
2006-06-18 14:17:57 · answer #2 · answered by the_decider 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only government bodies, but any organization that recieves taxpayer dollars and any set up as a charity, are prohibitted from discriminating. If an organization is completely private (no government grants, no federal loans, not publically traded), there should be no limits.
2006-06-18 15:20:21 · answer #3 · answered by john_stolworthy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maximum businesses are prohibited from discriminating on the inspiration of race, gender, incapacity, age (over 40), nationwide beginning, colour or faith. call VII of the Civil Rights Act and a variety of of alternative different regulations define extra particularly. even yet it additionally doesnt ward off basically intential racisim. It protects secure instructions against something that could reason undue hassle on a secure type. There are some exceptions like public protection, non secular businesses or if the discrimination is finished for motives of the standards of the pastime (ex. firefighter wanting to be waiting to hold somebody, bus driving force wanting to work out etc...). additionally verify your state and local regulations that shield extra instructions like weight, height, sexual orientation etc.
2016-10-31 02:37:41 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was later outlawed for private organizations with the Civil Rights Acts.
As not only a Jew, but a religious one I will choose not to respond to Meececat's ramblings, outside of asking what the heck it had to do with the question.
2006-06-18 14:22:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anon28 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋