NOt worring about the name
I give it 9 like i did the previous two times you posted the question.
I think the site is well balanced and well structured. It downloads at an acceptable speed on a busy 56k connection.
Overall I would have given it a 10 if it were not for two things.
You loose 0.5 for the featured pet. It is dark text on a dark background. On a slightly dark monitor the text is unreadable. change the text to a lighter colour if you can. I think maybe that part is being serverd by a different website, so changing it may be difficult. Okay i see it looks better in IE but the links are still slightly blured because it's blue on a blue background. The problem with the other dark text is most likely to do with the way FIREFOX interprets your style sheets. IN my experience firfoex does a good job with style sheets i write bu then they don't work prperly in IE. it's very irritationg for me because i am new to style sheets.
The other 0.5 point you loose for the reservation page. Using firefox i get an error saying my "the current browser is either too old or too modern (usind DOM document structure)" and then a date picker is way off at the bottem of the page. I would have taken 1 point but i see it works in IE6 which is means it will display correctly on more than 80% of the worlds computers.
I also like the fact that it's not rotten with images. The colour scheme is very consistent and doesn't change from page to page. There are no popups or flash content which i also like about it.
The last but no least you have provided alternate contact details not just a webform. People who don't like to uise the web forms can contact you by phone or email.
Worthy of mention is that all the links worked, there is no iritating background sound or moving text or flashy banners. Navigation is also a breeze, not confusing like some other pages.
Oh yes in the menu part, little strips are displayed in FIREFOX instead of 1 long one like in IE
2006-06-18 14:56:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by jason b 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I give it an 8. It looks interesting and would be a place I might go to get my pet sitting needs met if I had such. I love the presentation and the little dog at the bottom of the page. Nice layout. Crisp, clean looking. Good job.
2006-06-18 14:02:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by nanawnuts 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I like it, give it a 7. What would make it closer to 10 or even make it a ten is work on the syntax and either provide references from current and past clients or offer to provide the references upon request. You will have to make sure the references are continually updated and that your prospective clients can contact your references personally.
2006-06-18 15:37:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chellyt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd give it a 6.
There was all the information on the main page--it should be organized into smaller pages.
The design was a bit boring, but not tacky, like a MySpace layout--I'll give you that.
2006-06-18 14:20:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ariana 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the only interior the grasp bathing room is a 0. The seat is loose and it has 2 push buttons for flushing. One for low means, one for best. I hate it. i exploit the only interior the concentrated visitor bathing room and it truly is a fine looking 10. It has a cope with! won't be able to attend to flow domicile and use it!
2016-10-31 02:37:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
about a 5. The legal links left me cold. And there was not link that I could see to my favorite dog site--
http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/abc.htm
2006-06-18 14:01:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. The name did not even attract me to open it. Failed right there!
2006-06-18 13:56:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Junk Head 3
·
0⤊
0⤋