No jail time....but maybe a giant dunce hat in a public square?
2006-06-18 12:53:32 · 19 answers · asked by loubean 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I would vote for a law that would prevent misinformed and stupid people from having their vote count. (weighted according to knowledge level at the very least)
2006-06-18 15:31:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Never!!! All those dunce caps would be blinding--stupidity is not a crime--but the people who are should have stayed in school--to learn, not to goof off and socialize.
2006-06-18 20:05:32 · answer #2 · answered by Terri C. 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I rather enjoy my freedom and, being thrown in jail would certainly put a damper on that. Productivity levels would go way down, because everyone would be lallygagging in the public square instead of working.
2006-06-18 19:58:10 · answer #3 · answered by Josie 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, everyone does something stupid at one point or another. But, I think we should take away laws that protect really stupid people. For example, "don't try to beat a train in your car." If we did away with that beauty, a lot of unintelligent people would cease to be.
2006-06-18 19:57:51 · answer #4 · answered by corbeyelise 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would, kinda like you would know you were about to deal with a stupid person before the interaction started. You could be forwarned.
2006-06-18 19:57:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe - although stupid is a vague term...it would have to be very well defined & the matter of who decides who is or is not stupid would have to be disclosed as well
2006-06-18 19:58:08 · answer #6 · answered by Devo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could never work because people don't know the difference between people who are stupid and people who disagree with them.
2006-06-18 20:09:07 · answer #7 · answered by » mickdotcom « 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not - it's not someones fault that they are smart or stupid - they are born that way. Should we outlaw short or unattractive people too?
2006-06-18 19:58:42 · answer #8 · answered by Carbon-based 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're a pilgram & it's the yr. 1516.
Wait. Do you mean bush? I may have 2and thoughts.
2006-06-18 20:02:03 · answer #9 · answered by Calee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not - how are you ever going to find enough smart people to enforce it?
2006-06-18 19:57:14 · answer #10 · answered by Pascal 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋