English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

THE 9/11 ATTACKS - WHAT WE KNOW:
The Bush administration was comprised of a group of people who had published a radical foreign policy. Elements of this policy include what is now known as the Bush preemptive doctrine. When Paul Wolfowitz first created this policy for the George H. W Bush administration it was dismissed as insane. This group of people created an agenda and a strategy to advance it. This group openly stated ”Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. Domestic politics and industrial policy will shape the pace and content of transformation as much as the requirements of current missions.“ The Bush administration was comprised of people who had a clear and public MOTIVE for creating or enabling the attacks of 9/11. This is a issue that should be addressed by our media, our lawmakers, our citizens and the rest of the world.
Every procedure that was in place to deal with domestic hijackings was ignored on the day of the attacks.
Why did the Secret Service feel that there was no need to protect George W. Bush?
George Bush resisted an official inquiry into the worst national disaster since Pearl Harbor for 18 months. Any reasonable person would want to know what happened and they would want to make sure that there were no traitors in our mists. It was reasonable to consider the possibilities that the people who planned an attack like this had inside help. A president would want this checked out. George W. Bush wanted no investigation. He already had an official story and was quickly passed on to the press.
Every bit of evidence at Ground Zero and the Pentagon was confiscated and destroyed, and not preserved as crime scene evidence. This in itself is a crime. No need to look further. This is not in dispute. The George W. Bush is responsible for ordering or allowing the destruction of crime scene evidence.
There is not a shred of evidence that a 757 hit the Pentagon. All films from security cameras at the scene were confiscated and never seen again. The few frames of video from the Pentagon security camera were leaked to the public from an anonymous source in the Pentagon. When information is leaked from the Pentagon during a heightened state of emergency it is cause for concern. Neither the administration or the press question this breech of security. This is a clear indication of an intentional leak designed to sell the official story. If a 757 had hit the Pentagon they would have released the videos that were confiscated.
The hole made in the Pentagon crash is far too small for a 757 to have made.
Dozens of bin Laden family members were hurried out of the country without FBI interrogation immediately after the attacks.
None of the alleged hijackers was on any passenger list of the hijacked planes.
Eyewitness accounts describe a windowless, blue plane hitting the WTC.
Someone placed ‘put’ orders on the two hijacked airlines before the attacks, and stood to net huge stock market profits.
The Twin Towers both collapsed at free fall speed in the manner of a planned demolition, with visible explosions occurring in sequence on floors never hit by the planes.
The owner of the WTC admitted that Tower 7 was ‘taken down’ (intentionally demolished) by the Fire Department. THIS IS A CONFESSION! DO WE NEED MORE EVIDENCE?
Condoleezza Rice lied under oath to the Kean Commission about the warning memo that stated bin Laden was targeting the US.
Condoleezza Rice lied when she claimed that no one could have imagined an attack using airliners as weapons. NORAD had drilled for such events 2 years before the Bush White House claimed that they never could have imagined it.
George Bush claimed he saw the first plane hit Tower One, when no photos of the crash had been shown on any television screen.
George Bush sat silently in a classroom for seven full minutes after being informed that a second plane had hit the WTC. Why did George W. Bush react to the attacks differently than every other person in the nation? While every American jumped into emergency mode, George W. Bush did not flinch. He was not worried about his own safety or about the security of the nation. Why not?
NORAD did not send up a single interceptor jet despite knowing that four hijackings were taking place.
FBI agents and bomb sniffer dogs went through trash bins in both WTC Towers for weeks prior to the attacks. They were suddenly removed prior to the attack. Some people in our government were trying to do their job, others might have been trying to prevent the job from being done.
Dick Cheney was in charge of a series of drills held on the morning of September 11th, simulating attacks by hijacked airliners on the WTC.
No one in the US government is willing to investigate any of these and hundreds more concerns about this terrible event.
THE WARS AGAINST AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ – WHAT WE KNOW:
Members of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) occupy or had occupied many important positions in the present Bush administration.
PNAC explained the need for wars against Iraq and Afghanistan in papers published in the late 1990’s.
PNAC urged President Bill Clinton to invade Iraq, but was turned down.
PNAC member, Paul Wolfowitz, ADMITS that it was about OIL! HE ADMITTED IT! THE PRESS IGNORED THIS!!! ARE YOU LISTENING! DO YOU NEED MORE PROOF THAN A CONFESSION FROM ONE OF THE ARCHITECTS OF THE WAR??? ARE YOU LISTENING???
The PNAC thesis “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” stated that Americans would not accept pre-emptive wars against Iraq or Afghanistan unless there was a ‘catastrophic event like a New Pearl Harbor’ inside the country. Again we establish motive for complicity in the events of 9/11.
The Bush administration was trying to negotiate an oil pipeline deal with the Taliban before 9/11. They promised the leaders of Afghanistan a ‘carpet of bombs’ should the deal fall through. The deal fell through.
Deputy Director of the FBI, John O’Neill, quit his job in protest over this threat. O’Neill died in the attacks on the WTC on September 11th.
The attack on Afghanistan was explained as retaliation against the Taliban for not turning Osama bin Laden over to American authorities.
Both Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powel stated prior to 9/11 that Saddam Hussein did not possess weapons of mass destruction and that he was unable to pose a threat to his neighbors or the US.
George W. Bush came into the White House intent upon removing Saddam Hussein from power.
Donald Rumsfeld stated that the response to 9/11 should be an attack on Iraq because that’s where the targets were.
The UN inspectors were given unfettered access to sites Iraq, and requested more time to complete their task.
Everyone in the Bush administration with access to the media stressed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction capable of killing millions of Americans.
A totally false connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein was fabricated and repeated at every possible opportunity.
In October, 2002, George W. Bush lied to the Congress of the United States about the imminent threat posed by Saddam Hussein. In a brazen and impeachable act, he manipulated intelligence information in order to procure Congressional approval for his war against Iraq.
Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld spent months assuring the American public that their lives were in great danger unless the US waged a preventive war against Iraq. There was no doubt about the accuracy of their information, they said. No doubt at all. Mushroom clouds were on the horizon.
In January, 2003, George W. Bush lied to the nation in his SOTU speech about nuclear material obtained by Saddam. His unrelenting terror tactics and repeated references to Iraq’s WMD’s paved the way for public acceptance for a war he had planned for years.
In February, 2003, Colin Powell lied to the UN on two separate occasions in a futile attempt to convince the Security Council of the immediate threat presented by Iraq.
Despite UN inspectors’ statements to the contrary, George Bush told the nation that Saddam Hussein was not in compliance with the UN resolution requiring open inspections.
In March, 2003, boasting of a bombing strategy named ‘shock and awe,’ George Bush invaded Iraq.
More than 100,000 Iraqi civilians have died in George Bush’s war. Nearly 1700 American troops have lost their lives. Nearly 200 coalition forces are dead. Untold thousands are maimed. The carnage continues and civil war is imminent.
The minutes of the Downing Street meeting between George Bush and Tony Blair revealed an agreement to attack Iraq months before the invasion itself.
George W. Bush violated international law by waging a preventive war on a non-threatening, sovereign nation. That illegal war continues to this day.
THE ABUSE AND TORTURE OF PRISONERS – WHAT WE KNOW:
On May 7th, 2002, the US officially withdrew from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The US now has immunity from the court for US citizens suspected of atrocities. US soldiers serving overseas are immune from prosecution in the court, while politicians and US officials, including CIA operatives, can claim diplomatic immunity.
Shortly after 9/11, WH legal counsel, Alberto Gonzalez, drafted a memo in which he virtually changed the rules of prisoner treatment. The memo declared the war on terror to be conflict against a vast, outlaw, international enemy in which the rules of war, international treaties and even the Geneva Conventions did not apply. Alberto Gonzales was subsequently appointed US Attorney General.
In January, 2002, the WH legal department issued another memo concluding that neither the Geneva Conventions nor any of the laws of war applied to the conflict in Afghanistan.
In February of 2002, George Bush signed a secret order authorizing the CIA. To set up a series of secret detention facilities outside the United States, and to question those held in them with unprecedented harshness.
•The Bush administration then began to send terror suspects to other countries for interrogation, thereby absolving the US of blame for torture applied elsewhere.
In 2003, Abu Ghraib was formally handed over to tactical control of military-intelligence units for the expressed purpose of extracting information from detainees.
As an outcome of regular inspections, the International Commission of the Red Cross broke its rule of secrecy by publicly complaining of the systemic abuse of prisoners, in Iraq and Afghanistan, detailing methods of abuse that were in clear violation of international law.
In 2004, hundreds of photographs and video tapes were released that revealed shocking methods of abuse and torture of detainees in Abu Ghraib prison.
Despite many complaints about abuse, no investigation of prisoner treatment was held until it was clear these photographs were about to be leaked to the media.
Many civilian contractors were employed to carry out ‘interrogations’ of detainees.
Many of the detainees had committed no crimes, but had been arrested in huge sweeps of Iraqi men intended to secure information about insurgent attacks.
Interrogations were conducted and supervised by military intelligence operatives who ordered that prisoners be ‘softened up’ for questioning.
Abuses often were sexual in nature, preying upon the cultural sensitivities of Moslem men regarding nudity and public sexual acts.
Abuses were systemic throughout Iraq and Guantanamo Bay.
Hundreds of other photos and videos were kept secret by the Pentagon, and have recently been ordered released to the public.
The Bush administration attributed the abuse to the work of a few ‘bad apple’ underlings, and denied any knowledge or approval by anyone in the administration.
Reports of Koran desecration at Guantanamo were corroborated by the Pentagon.
To date, civilian aircraft continue to fly terror suspects to other countries for harsh and illegal interrogation methods.
To date, no one in the Pentagon or the White House has been held accountable for the widespread abuse and torture of prisoners. To date, only enlisted personnel have been charged with any abuses or torture. To date, further investigations have been dropped.

2006-06-18 12:03:51 · 21 answers · asked by joeblack605 2 in Politics & Government Government

Instead we attack and Invade the wrong country and kill the wrong people , well atleast they have oil ....We will make due

2006-06-18 12:04:50 · update #1

Is there anyone still STUPID enough to belive it wasent a scam ?

2006-06-18 12:05:36 · update #2

We have no Time to READ the Truth , Lets just watch brain wash TV Fox News they will form an opinion for us .

2006-06-18 12:06:33 · update #3

You conspiracy nuts ? What are you STUPID ? or Blind ? This is called PROOF Moron !!

2006-06-18 12:14:49 · update #4

21 answers

well i read it all, very concise.

i believe that is meant to be "traitors in our midst", not "in our mists"

apart from that you summed it up pretty well, the answers before me are idicative of the general problem we face.

The population is blinded by idiocy and sloth.

even if you convince anyone with enough brain to understand you, you still have millions of people too stupid and lazy to read, watch or listen.

Also, people have blind faith in the bush administration, for many people it doesn't matter what you say, you are obviously lying, and they will never listen, the administration has become somewhat like any other orginised religion, it preaches about God and the fight for good. it is dogmatic and as such it has its zealots.

If I were you, i'd move to canada. I'm in Australia, but even we have our lying little leader who spends more tiime in bush's pants than he does taking care of our country.


This whole disaster will only be noticed in retrospective, once everyone who could have taken blame is safely dead or infirm.

2006-06-18 12:27:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

This questions is rather long but I read most of it in the book "The New Pearl Harbor" and I believe, 100%, we, the american people, have been taken for a ride, PERIOD! Regardless of which story about 9/11 you choose to believe, it is a "Consipracy Theory". For those of you who aren't educated...a Conspiracy is a plan or act of two or more persons to do an evil act. You either believe the consiracy that involves Bin Laden and his "gang" or that which involves are own officials. My biggest issue, being that Im from NY, is the towers. I just don't understand how they could have completly fallen. Granted the upper levels above where the impact was were "melting" but that doesnt mean that both towers would be completly destroyed. It's more probable that the upper levels would have eventually callapsed but that at least 30 floors of the towers would have remained standing. The fires were stong...were the impact was...what about the lower floors? The lower floors had no "raging" fires that caused the so-called fireproofing to fail. There is no reason to believe that the bottom of the towers could not have survived that callapse of the upper floors. We can never really know for sure what happened on 9/11 but we do know that in 1996 the two men prosecuted for the 1993 WTV bombings were captured by the Officials who confiscated their laptops, which they found information regarding an attack using airliners as missles to hit places like WTC, Pentegon, White House and CIA headquarters. When this was brought to our Government, it was ignored. We also recieved warnings from Russia, Israel, Egypt, and many many more. The Russian president was even quoted saying he doesnt understand how the USA allowed such an event to happen because they had so much forwarning. We are the lauginh stock of the world. Everyone knew this was going to happen except us. We were kept in the dark up until the very last minute....oh and another fact to ponder over....about 6 top pentagon officals cancelled their flights on 9/11 saying it was because of security issues....why weren't the people warned about such "security Issues"? The "put Option" for American & United was at 1200% 3 days before 9/11...so obviously, people in the US knew this was going to happen. And those people that put options into American and United made could have made over 10 Billion dollars after 9/11.

2006-06-19 01:25:59 · answer #2 · answered by SexyMommy2B 4 · 1 0

You and the person who calls himself the PATRIOT should take a house by the side of the sea and watch the sunset. You have the same driving hatred of George W. Bush. You have the same Yahoo Answers style which is to ask a "question" that has been "borrowed" from some left-wing web site using "cut and paste". No debate. No original thought. No logical argument. Just hatred.

For all I know, you are the PATRIOT.

2006-06-18 12:17:43 · answer #3 · answered by Radio Spy 3 · 0 0

Wow....is there an actual question in there somewhere?

You may choose what you believe. Do you think it might be possible that the information YOU have stated here is faulty? You seem very willing to believe all these things.

The truth is, you have been fooled by the leftist conspiracy theorists. I'm sure nothing I say can sway your opinion, and any question you might have asked in that blurb of 'facts' was simply rhetorical. You weren't really looking for an answer to any question. A more appropriate place for such information is a blog.

2006-06-18 12:15:33 · answer #4 · answered by NateTrain 3 · 1 0

You know what you need to go the hell away. People who love this country are hurt by the events and people like myself that lost loved ones dont want to hear it. The fact is that it happened and no amount of ranting and raving can change that. The fact is that Osama Bin Ladden and gang admitted that they were in fact responsible for it and the fact is that I want the people RESPONSIBLE for taking those planes and doing what they did to pay. That is the facts. I do not want to hear one word about conspiracies or pacts or anything. You come of as a terriorist by talking this way about your supposed country. Go away!!!

2006-06-18 12:27:30 · answer #5 · answered by lvb524 3 · 0 0

9/11 conspiracy - brought to you by the same sickoes who try to tell the world that the Jewish Holocaust did not happen. Bottom line is a lot of people died in 9/11, and a lot of people died in the Holocaust. And both were WRONG!!

If only we humans could reckognise our Heavenly Creator and live as He intended, this world would be so much better.

2006-06-19 17:45:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I've read about this before, it sounds plausible enough to me, but then again, so do most conspiracy theories. I don't have the facts nor the will to do the research and find them for myself. I'm more interested in the flamage that's sure to come on this thread, and the main reason I'm posting this is so I can easily find it later and read other people's posts.

2006-06-18 12:08:41 · answer #7 · answered by Robert B 3 · 0 0

These conspiracy theories about 9/11 are getting real old. You conspiracy nuts are crazy. Osama bin Laden and his thugs admitted they were responsible for 9/11. I, for one want them to pay big time.

2006-06-18 19:29:50 · answer #8 · answered by SeahawkFan37 5 · 1 1

firstly, i don't even believe your an american to begin with, yur just using it as a pretext to give whatever the hell you just typed seem more credible. second, yes i didn't read it all (chances are, not many would either...learn to write short freak). and lastly, stop with the conspiracy theories, its getting old.

2006-06-18 12:09:46 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

the videos fooled us. they're all shot on blue screen. see this picture of how insanely plane could crash into pentagon like crashing into a pile of butter. it's violated law of physics, but the videos fooled the world. see this http://reopening911.blogspot.com/2006/06/more-proof-of-september-11-conspiracy.html

2006-06-19 06:01:31 · answer #10 · answered by aiyo! 1 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers