English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

a simple yes or no will sufice

2006-06-18 10:25:59 · 38 answers · asked by Geaux_Tigers 2 in Politics & Government Government

By the way you are morons if you said that said we wouldn't be there in the first place.
We were already in Iraq by the election of 2004

2006-06-18 10:34:21 · update #1

By the way John Kerry is a fag

2006-06-18 10:36:13 · update #2

38 answers

If you can believe what he said....No. Read for yourself.

Question 1: Do you believe that the troops should withdraw from Iraq?

KERRY: Over a period of time under proper circumstances, and I have laid out a plan for that. My plan is based on success. I’ve laid out a plan where you establish a series of very specific benchmarks for Iraqi performance, and with each benchmark, our troops should be able to return home. Clearly I’ve laid out a way where we could have made very different choices in Iraq, and I regret that this administration has never reached out to work in a bipartisan way, and has never done the work necessary to put these steps in place.

2006-06-18 10:44:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

When you're talking about John Kerry, you can't get a yes or no question.

Remember: He voted for it before he voted against it.

So to answer your question i'd have to say:
It is possible, but not probable. Givin the state of things that are going on over there he'd have to give it some major thought, consult with his staff, get recommendations from congress, and poll the general public. All in all it's a definate question and one that isn't answered lightly. I'd say maybe with a chance of might on the side of probably not. Things like this can't be taken too seriously. There are a lot of lives at stake here. Did I mention that John Kerry was in Vietnam. Let's not forget that.
And that is why ice cream is better than pudding.

I hope that helps.

2006-06-23 20:01:13 · answer #2 · answered by smutulator 1 · 0 0

Many people responding to this question are confused.

The troops went into Iraq before the 2004 Presidential election. So to say "We wouldn't be in Iraq in the first place if Kerry was elected" is kind of nutty.

Whatever Kerry would have decided to do, he would have asked the couragous French and United Nations for permission first.

2006-06-18 10:31:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If John Kerry was elected President, He would laugh like Side Show Bob from the Simpsons

2006-06-18 10:29:25 · answer #4 · answered by Mojo Jojo 3 · 0 0

in undemanding words KUCINOCH(spelling?) VOTED antagonistic to INVADING IRAQ. i'm no longer voting for Hillary, even if that is humorous to work out her getting a flavor of her own hypocrisy in this problem. No, Kerry would run from any probability and throw money or perhaps lob some missiles or intense altitude bombs at issues, and plead for safe practices from China or Russia to guard us, and help France's imperial declare on all Europe via the ecu. i easily do not comprehend what Kerry stands for, except continuously being antagonistic to the wrestle antagonistic to tyranny and violators of human rights and freedom regularly. Afterall the in undemanding words rights or freedoms you pick, are those the liberals inform you to practice.

2016-11-14 22:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's a little late for that. Kerry would have never invaded Iraq without UN approval to begin with. Now we're in so far we can't just pull out so even if he did get elected it wouldn't be right away.

2006-06-18 10:28:47 · answer #6 · answered by DiRTy D 5 · 0 0

We wouldn't be in Iraq in the first place if Kerry was elected President.

2006-06-18 10:27:55 · answer #7 · answered by myspace.com/shosmusic 3 · 0 0

No. Kerry is part of the elite of the illuminati and he too is only a pawn of the darker forces and the darker forces are the antichrists. Jesus has shown me that the ones who deny Christ is the son of God are the antichrists. Here is a list of antichrists as seen in my vision given by Jesus` grace. Jesus says by no way are these the only ones as they have minions placed strategically throughout governments and societies.


Rothschild Bank of London and Berlin,
Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris,
Israel-Moses-Scief Bank of Italy,
Warburg Bank of Hamburg,
Lehman Brothers Bank of New York,
Chase Manhattan of New York,
Rockefeller Banks of New York,
The J. P. Morgan Trust Company, of New York.

These Jewish family owned banks, are the real forces behind the scenes that control our world.

Peter Kershaw shows us who owns the Federal Reserve System of America in "Economic Solutions".

He lists the ten primary shareholders
in the Federal Reserve banking system:
1) The Rothschild Family* - London
2) The Rothschild Family* - Berlin
3) The Lazard Brothers - Paris
4) Israel Seiff* - Italy
5) Kuhn-Loeb Company* - Germany
6) The Warburgs* - Amsterdam
7) The Warburgs* - Hamburg
8) Lehman Brothers* - New York
9) Goldman & Sachs* - New York
10) The Rockefeller Family - New York.

Through their banks, they control, and/or own outright, most of the Corporations of America, and in the entire world.

In fact two Jewish families, control all the American food exports, to the Communist Nations. These Jewish Banking family dynasties, own or control, through their hidden holding companies, the news media, the radio and television networks, the newspapers, and most of the publishing houses in the world.

2006-06-18 11:20:16 · answer #8 · answered by the_decider 2 · 0 0

Someone said they don't care? You don't care about troops in harm's way for no reason?

Sure, Kerry would do the right thing regardless. Bush is a huge mistake and the country has learned that now juding by the polls.

2006-06-18 10:29:21 · answer #9 · answered by jumpingrightin 6 · 0 0

Yes and he would save American lives but abandon the unarmed citizens of Iraq who are dependent on the U.S. for protection from the terrorist murdering invaders. So he would have blood on his hand either way.
and because he is a weak , slithering pacifist he would probably disarm the American forces and allow Korea to nuke us and shut down our military and leave us vulnerable to attack. If you thought 911 was terrible...elect Kerry for more of the same

2006-06-18 10:28:30 · answer #10 · answered by toe poe gee gee oh 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers