Gen Gen how could you ask such a question. Women off course.
2006-06-18 06:33:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by zaazzy 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Being a good lover isn't a technical skill, it's about the interaction between two people. Someone can't claim to be a brilliant lover if their partner doesn't get involved - and if they do then they are great lovers together.
2006-06-18 13:33:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. A great lover knows their own body well enough to share what they need for pleasure AND delights both in sharing that info, and in taking the time to learn their partner.
They understand that the learning process - mastering your own body and your partner's, is indeed its own reward.
They understand that every new partner is different and offers an all new world to explore.
They are more eager to learn then to demonstrate what they think they know.
2006-06-18 13:32:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lori A 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems like a lot of women are more reserved than men. I've always wished for a women who was as willing to try different things as I am.
2006-06-18 13:36:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That depends, gengen, on who the man or the woman is? It can be either, and hopefully, both! The winner of the "who is best" contest, would be the one who puts the most effort and thought into it, as well as the finding out what his/her partner wants and likes!
2006-06-18 13:34:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by mrb1205 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think most of people do not have any wish to investigate both sexes as lovers, including me.
2006-06-18 13:33:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hmm...can I visit YOUR castle? Sounds very "Interesting"...
2006-06-18 13:32:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i cant say with out knowing the actually people you are talking about
2006-06-18 13:49:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
women
2006-06-18 13:33:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by jen 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with happiestjulia. She said it best.
2006-06-18 13:52:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by Muddy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋