Is there evidence from genetics that evolution is impossible?

Answer 1

No. Our genes are way to close to chimpazees etc to be by accident.

Answer 2

No there is no evidence in genetics that evolution is impossible. If there were evolution would not be a scientific theory any longer. A theory in science is very different from the common term. All we know about genetics points to evolution being true, macro and micro. From hox genes to mtDNA all support evolution.

Answer 3

Genetics means evolution. Whenever genes combine during the creation of offspring there are omissions and comissions in the gene sequence, this leads to the birth of individulas who are in some way or other different from their parents.

And that is evolution.

Why ? Genetics agrees with your "God" and Evolution doesn't ?

Answer 4

easily, the geologic record does no longer help the perception of evolution. It does help transformations interior of a species, even if it does no longer help the replace of one species into yet another. The genetic relationship between all residing issues does no longer prepare (or perhaps scientifically propose) an common ancestor. It only identifies that each and each one sorts of existence in the international are composed of an same progression blocks. As with maximum so-referred to as evidence, Mendel's paintings should be completely distorted with the intention to slot that sq. peg into the round hollow. Mendel (besides as Darwin) does no longer comprehend the conclusions from their paintings (or the outline of their paintings for that remember). there is not any (repeat no, in case you pick) verifiable clinical evidence for the replacing of one species into yet another. there is major evidence for the idea of micro-evolution. in case you actual study the technology, you'll locate that the evidence you cite does no longer help the placement you espouse. God did not create this interlocking internet. guy did. Which jogs my memory of the old poem which says in part "what a tangled internet we weave after we first practice to lie to". The evidence isn't there, and repeating the matra doesn't make it look.

Answer 5

Depends what you mean by evolution. There are TWO theories of evolution. One is obviously true and the other is obviously untrue. The first theory states that organisms change depending on their environment. Changes that are helpful to survival, sometimes get passed on to their offspring. Note that these changes tend to be short lived....lasting a few generations. A point overlooked by evolutionists. And, yes, we are starting to understand the genetic basis for some of this observation.

The second theory of evolution states that different species of organsims evolve into other species of organism. That is flat out untrue and evidence from every single subfield of biology shows it to be untrue. The problem here is that species are distinct. There is not slow morphing of one species into another. Two species look similar and all life on earth has similar genetics, but there are no intermediate forms of one species into another. The lack of evidence for intermediate forms of life is particularly telling in genetics. You SHOULD be able to easily demonstrate evolution of one species into another doing simple studies with rapidly multiplying organisms like bacteria. The problem is you can't. Not only does one form of bacteria absolutely not evolve into other forms of bacteria (ie they are no "descended" from each other in any sense of the word), you don't even see slight genetic drift from one form to another when you do genetic studies.

It's not that genetics or other subfields of biology prove evolution is impossible. It's that, despite vast increases in our powers to observe the phenomenon, we see no evidence of it.....NONE.

Note that anti-creationists love to lie about this. What they usually do is refer to the first theory of evolution when citing the scientific evidence for evolution but they shift their meaning in mid-sentence to the second theory of evolution when they challenge creationism.

The truth is that both creationism and evolution are on equal footing. You have to take either on faith because there is no evidence for either.

Of course, when it comes to scientific proof for religious doctrine, I heard that they just found Noah's Ark. But, that's another story.

Answer 6

There is proof that mammals came from one single organism. The "hand" struccture of the human is similar to that of a dolphin, bat, and cat.
There's also a vestigial structure of a hip bone in whales.

Answer 7

No, genetics and physiology both indicate that evolution occurs.

Answer 8

Yeah, lets get some evidence that all the scientists are wrong and share it on yahoo answers!

Answer 9

No