Do uTHINK THAT THE KANE WHO "WAS IN WWF" & THE KANE WHO "IS IN WWE" ARE THE SAME PERSONS???

Question

I DONT THINK SO...............

Answer 1

The Kane of toady's WWE is 6'9 and 320 lbs. The original Kane was 7' and roughly the same weight. Looking at older pictures I have discovered that the old Kane had much bigger arms, chest and his hair was more wirey than the current Kanes just before he took his mask off. This Kane also is too pale and the voice isn't deep and gravely enough. There is no way they are the same person. Go the wwe websight and look at past years and see the difference. Buy old pay per view events and see the two different men that have portrayed Kane.

Answer 2

half-brother of The Undertaker. He re-debuted in the WWF at Bad Blood 1997 on October 5, 1997, costing The Undertaker his Hell in a Cell match with then WWF European Champion Shawn Michaels. Kane and The Undertaker feuded with one another over the following year, during which time their history vis-à-vis one another was expounded upon.
On May 18, 1998, Kane was revealed to be the result of a furtive union between The Undertaker's mother and Paul Bearer, an employee at the funeral home in Death Valley owned by The Undertaker's parents. When Kane and The Undertaker were children, The Undertaker "accidentally" burned down the funeral home, killing their parents and hideously scarring Kane both physically and mentally (the parents of The Undertaker are supposedly buried somewhere on Long Island; during an episode of RAW taped on Long Island, Kane and Bearer ostensibly exhumed their bodies and brought them to the arena).In June 2003,Triple H won the match following interference from his stablemates, and Kane removed his mask (and, in the process, his hair), revealing that his face was not actually scarred.


By 2003 The WWF was the WWE and Kane infact was the same man seeing as during the change from WWF to WWE he was heavily involved with a storyline it was the same man.

Answer 3

I personally don't think so. That would be a cool storyline twist. And would explain who the other Kane is. I watched some of the earlier matches of Kane and the Undertaker and noticed differences in the first Kane and Glen Jacobs. However, I have been known to be wrong once or twice in my lifetime so who knows.

Answer 4

The Kane without a mask is the same as it ever was Glen Jacobs, but the new Kane (with mask) is some dude from Ohio Valley Wrestling named Drew Hankinson

Answer 5

because of the fact Ever in view that He Took the mask Off, Or Had the 0.5 2002/2003 mask He Didnt grow to be As severe. particular he continues to be super, yet Hes way previous his best.his 2002/2003 gimmick became extraordinarily a lot what Made Us followers Lose Our concern. decrease back then from 1997-2002 while that hearth got here out we had shivers throughout our bodies. yet now to procure little infants cheering for Him! He truly desires to place the mask on, Or initiate a severe Phsyco Feud. Jobbing to Rey mysterio (Even tho Kane himself advised Writers that he had to place over youthful expertise) i think of there attempting Make Kane greater vicious as of previous due (previous due 2003 Feud with Kane,Rey mysterio homicide etc.) yet he will by no ability be the massive crimson monster he became decrease back interior the day. yet nevertheless Kane Is considered one of my All time Favoirites! WA:Masked kane (1997-2001) (no longer 0.5 mask)

Answer 6

Kane has always been Glen Jacobs. It's always been the same person. Kane (Glen Jacobs) was also Dr. Isaac Yankem.

Answer 7

of course. it took a long time before he took the mask off after wwf was changed to wwe. the only reason they changed it was to remove the confusion between the wrestling federation and World Welfare Foundation (or whatever, the thing with the panda logo)

Answer 8

On the same line is JBL the John Bradshaw from a few years back ??

Answer 9

yes, the kane of wwe is different guy.

Answer 10

they are the same person - never changed because of the name changing fro WWF to WWE -