English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Please support your answer or else it is just a silly answer.

2006-06-17 21:51:14 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

Perhaps the first answerer feel uncomfortable with my question for some personal reason...

2006-06-17 21:57:30 · update #1

law-abiding White racist, oops. Please support your answers

2006-06-17 21:59:04 · update #2

11 answers

Ummm... Well... I guess the one who asks that question!..

2006-06-17 21:55:51 · answer #1 · answered by ezgisito 4 · 0 2

i'll bite what you got for me. i don't know what a hit racist is but they sound real bad. i'd put him right up there with a dog eater places the human just shouldn't go. i'm not hung up on music theives i figure you support the artists you care about and you steal the rest. when you care about someone you take care of them. as for the minority who steals, give them the a day in court it's the american way. in the law abiding or other wise a racist is always bad not matter how you package it. if you're using dog eater in the context of native americans that would make you racist. i'm not saying you are or aren't but being a anglo-saxon raised on a reservation let me say native americans are people rich in history worthy of respect for culture even if i don't get that.

lol duh me this he's is asking if a white racist "hit racist" is better. No such thing as a law abiding racist. they are hands down the worst and interesting how your question comes down to who's worst. why n not ask who is better ? cause you swim the bottom looking for the lowest common denominator.

2006-06-18 05:06:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A minority stealing cigarettes!

anyone stealing cigarettes for that matter ---> as the act is concerned of STEALING a property which is not vital for survival
I wouldn't argue this e.g. for a food-thief.

(And it is MOST disgusting that some minorities abuse thier 'being' a minority as a means of justification to their crimes)

A law-abiding citizen -no matter his political opinions are- is a respectable person.

Dog-eater... Doesn't make sense by itself. I know many people in China or Thailand are eating dogs and THAT doesn't make them any less valuable or less respectable than they are supposed to be

mp3 song thief.. This issue is disputable. Artists make thier bigger share of money from the concerts and CD sales make a small ratio. Furthermore I do tend to think that artists themselves are not that much touchy to loyalties when it comes to 'get inspiration' from other people's work. So, mp3 downloading (hey, I'm not talking about stealing a person's ipod with mp3 files in it) would be the second worst in your listing but by far.

2006-06-18 05:03:44 · answer #3 · answered by Roland 6 · 0 0

A minority who steals cigarettes. I had to fire a few of these when I was a store manager. I am a law-abiding racist, and I am just fine. I don't pay for my song downloads, and I don't eat dogs... but by God, I am not a minority and I have to pay for my cigarettes. I'm surprised the government doesnt have a check for Newport purchase yet...

2006-06-24 22:50:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Racist myself

MP3-song theift isn't really thift is you ask me.... i mean people are sharing data over the net... been happing sence the net started up.... people going to start whinning about it now just becose there not making as many millions as they use to when it got popular i'm not going to feel sorry for them.....

I feel sorry for the person stealing cigarrettes.... for one part of the cost is becose people steal so it's covered some.... I think seling something that adictive and harmfull to some one is wrong anyway...

Whats wrong with some one eating a dog? It's an animal just like every other animal we eat.... and there sure are a lot of them, a lot getting uthanized too.... why let that killed dog go to waist?

2006-06-18 05:02:22 · answer #5 · answered by CrazyCat 5 · 0 0

the worst? I'd have to say a dog-eater. the other three don't directly cause physical harm. because you see, if the dog eater didn't eat dogs than there wouldn't be people to butcher them because there would be no market for it. cause and effect.

2006-06-18 04:56:08 · answer #6 · answered by xtragicallyxbeautifulx 3 · 0 0

What is a law-abiding hit racist?

2006-06-18 04:56:11 · answer #7 · answered by hotclaws 5 · 0 0

You are silly....None of these is better than the other....But if i have to pick on it would be Dog Eater....cos thats really gross and dogs are supposed to be a mans best friend and NOT mans best Meal..

2006-06-18 04:58:56 · answer #8 · answered by Missylicious 3 · 0 0

A dog eater because that's the only one that would cause physical harm.

2006-06-18 04:57:57 · answer #9 · answered by Jade Ariana 3 · 0 0

A dog eater of course.. No need to ask that...

2006-06-18 14:05:22 · answer #10 · answered by _Lilith_ 3 · 0 0

the minority

2006-06-18 04:57:01 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers