Is it a mistake to prosecute attacks on gays as hate crimes?

Question

Four teens recently assaulted a gay man in New York's East Village. There have been many such attacks over the years--some ending with the attackers committing suicide. Why do these attacks keep occurring? Are we ignoring nature's warning signs that may be telling us that something is very wrong with gay invoked laws that force employers to hire them, landlords to rent to them. And gays are currently suing the human race for laws that will force artificial marriages on society.

As per "Bonus Of Virtue" by Aaron Westley Powell, the forthcoming novel about paying for your sins in the afterlife, Homosexuality is nothing more than a genocide occult of failed human beings with artificial intelligence, who's obvious plan is to destroy the human race.

If the world gave in to gay whims it would clearly spell the doom of human life on Earth. The East Village attack may not hate a crime, but rather the beginning of the human race defending itself against the gay rights movement and the laws gays have generated that punish normal people for coming to the defense of of their attacks on the human race? Society should set up a legal defense fund for the four teens charged in the attack. The teens may have merely reacted to their common sense--that triggered them into becoming involuntary soldiers.

This question is not about the Bible or Christianity regarding references to common sense and homosexuality. Homosexuality is not about people or even human beings. It's about lust and sexual mperversion. Common sense is hearing, seeing, smelling, touching, and tasting, and all together, our sixth sense of tuition. Which all together tells human beings that men are intended for women and vice-versa. Gays want an artificial lifestyle as opposed to a real life. They want to adopt children as opposed to being natural and having children the natural way nature intended. Gays are ok until they start trying to force normal people to defy their common sense and accept their lifestyle as normal when it's nothing but an abberation against the human race. When a person's brain reacts to this attack of gays trying to make people accept the idea that a penis up one's but is normal, when common sense tells us that all the poisons and human waste comes out the butt, that's not a hate crime--that's t

that's the human brain being disoriented. And no human being who reacts by attacking gays in defense of gays attacking the human race should be prosecuted. Yes, I agree with the Muslum culture--that gays who live their lives in their own private world are ok--but those who try and force their artificial intelligence on others should be retaliated agfainst.

Answer 1

You are one twisted individual. Using this as a platform to try and condone violence against someone who dares to be different from your little moral code or the one set out by your church? Where do we stop? Give out warrants allowing homosexuals to be hunted down or hey I know, lets start a political party and just wipe out anyone who isn't part of the white god fearing master race. These people attacked HUMAN BEINGS and should face the penalties of their acts from the law. Maybe you didn't read about the man who was attacked and killed in London UK recently, simply for being gay. Maybe you can write to his family and tell them it was meant to be that way.....

Answer 2

Oh these kinda post always just crack me up. The "good, kind and loving" Christian trying to make some kind of justification for the beating of another human being. Give me a break.
As to your question, oh definitely yes...so long as there are people in the world that think as you do (that thought being "I'm not gay so I'm right when deciding how they should be treated, even if it means treating them less than human") And the poor attackers are committing suicide? Sounds to me like they should think about becoming gay, if they are violent towards others AND suicidal...I'd think they'd be better off. And I can for sure say that I'd rather have a gay tenant above anyone else.
Then again, in re-reading your question I'm thinking you couldn't possibly think and all that had to be made up just to see what people would say..haha..I'm still gonna post this..

Answer 3

I think that any crime should be prosecuted. What are the gays doing to you personally?if they have wronged you in some criminal act then they should be prosecuted, not because you may not agree with the way they choose to live their life. We have many enemies right now all over the world, we seem to be the most hated nation on the planet I think we should expend our energy right now protecting ourselves and our freedoms to live our lives as we please( as long as it is legal) rather than creating division amoungst ourselves.I am not gay and I have a great family and life, I do not have anything against those who are gay even though I do not understand it just has nothing to do with me. I would not want anyone harassing me or telling me that my lifestyle is inappropriate and would defend it at any cost, why would you expect anything else from someone else? Look to your own faults and make appropriate changes and leave others to their own morality or definition of it.

Answer 4

No.It is not a mistake to prosecute anyone who uses violence because they don't like someone who is different from themselves. Sounds like you are easily persuaded to be ignorant and intolerant and have reduced gay people to being sub-human. When you reduce any kind of people to less than human it makes it easier to justify violence against them. Study the history of the Nazis who did that to Jews, Gays, Gypsies, the mentally and physically ill.and anyone else who didn't endorse or believe their agenda. Gays have been around for thousands of years and the human race is still here. By the way maybe you could elaborate on what warning signs nature is giving you. Hope no one wants to beat you to death because of how you believe.

Answer 5

the theory that motive determines the crimes isn't new. Manslaughter isn't a similar element as 1st or maybe 2d degree homicide, yet the in reality large difference is motive. So from a felony attitude, defining against the law to be better severe no matter if that's inspired by ability of bigotry is on good floor. Crimes inspired by ability of bigotry are a kind of terrorism, it really is way worse than an straight forward crime, because the motive is not merely to damage a human being, yet also to damage an entire crew. those who attempt this pose a larger probability to society as an entire than do those who devote a similar crime with out the form of motivation. by ability of how, there's a invoice being pushed that ought to avert law from being mixed like this. it really is said as the “study the charges Act”, and is being subsidized by ability of an organization huge-spread as "Downsize DC". in case you prefer to ascertain an end to this manner of blend law, tell your representatives to vote for the "study the charges Act".

Answer 6

No it is not a mistake to prosecute attacks on gays as hate crimes. The people that do these things are ignorant and should be spending time in jail.

The people that agree with them and question the possibility of this being a hate crime, should be there with them.

Answer 7

If the fuel behind the attack is because the individual is gay, then yes, it should be prosecuted as a hate crime. No different than if a person is assaulted over their race, religion, creed, nationality, etc...

Answer 8

I think its a mistake to differentiate any crimes as hate crimes. When was the last time any murder was done in love? Such laws minimize the seriousness of "every-day" crimes. How does a certain motive for a crime make it more serious? If someone shoots you for your wallet, are they less guilty than if they shoot you because you're gay, or black, or a woman, etc.,.?

Answer 9

No matter how people feel about homosexuals, it should be treated as a hate crime because it IS! We should be hating a person's actions, NOT the person!

And why the (BLEEP!) is it that people want to bring up the Bible when it comes to homosexuality, but no one talks about the Bible when someone mass murders!

I, for one, despite being a Christian, tolerate homosexuals. I treat them like a heterosexual.

Answer 10

First, I'm not gay.Married 6 kids ,5 grands.Second,no matter who you are no one has the right to lay a hand on anyone else unless threatened with bodily harm.So unless a gay person threatened to stick you in the ***,you those people or any one else should be convicted.