2006-06-17 15:21:35 · 9 answers · asked by Road Trip 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
I'm not starting any rumors--it's simply a hypothetical question.
2006-06-17 15:26:32 · update #1
Nirvana should stay the Nirvana of the early 90's. Any attempt to revive Nirvana would not be Nirvana.
2006-06-17 15:24:43 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 11⤊ 1⤋
Posers would love it, true Nirvana fans would hate Chris, it be good if that didn't happen.
2006-06-17 15:27:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope bad idea
2006-06-17 15:28:43 · answer #3 · answered by ♥jen♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would think it would be sad that Foo Fighters broke up.
2006-06-17 15:26:50 · answer #4 · answered by cynicusprime 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELL NO
nobody can replace kurt in our hearts
or in the band
EVER
2006-06-17 15:24:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that were to ever happen, I would PERSONALLY PULL THE TRIGGER ON THE SHOTGUN THIS TIME.
:-)
2006-06-17 17:49:12 · answer #6 · answered by YEWSLUS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be really unfair to both of them.
2006-06-17 15:28:30 · answer #7 · answered by Kate D. 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
boycott
2006-06-17 15:24:21 · answer #8 · answered by Jbeezy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ew, no way.
2006-06-17 15:30:50 · answer #9 · answered by Heather S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋