If we spent the dollars we are using on wars in Afghanistan and Iraq on a "Manhattan Project"-like effort to come up with a viable alternative to oil, wouldn't we solve the problem in short order? When Kennedy challenged us to go to the moon, we responded with innovation. Is innovation dead? Is our government really doing the right thing for its citizens by catering to the oil industry? Why don't they have a concrete proposal for an energy policy that isn't based on insane ideas like "corn to ethanol". That's just a farm subsidy, and it makes no sense.
2006-06-17
08:59:09
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Been There Twice
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
"Economics" is not an answer. Since 94% of your answers suck, J, I shouldn't expect much from you.
2006-06-17
17:26:18 ·
update #1
Wow, what a sad excuse for answers. We're the one's who elect the politicians. We don't have to let the oil companies and the Arabs rape us. Their record profits are coming out of our hides. Our tax dollars can be used to research solutions.
2006-06-17
17:34:26 ·
update #2