Considering Earth did form despite the odds against it, wouldn't it be possible that another animal on the other side of the world developed at least some intelligence and became capable of speach of some sort? I mean if you believe everything happened by chance, rather than being set into motion by some intelligent force.
The big bang theory states that the process began with a huge explosion of light, and then different building blocks came together to form matter. It also says that if the explosion had sent the masses traveling 1/100 of a percent faster, the energy would not have had time to form matter under gravity. If it had occured 1/100 of a percent slower, it would have collapsed under it's own gravity and nothing would have come of it.
Earth is exactly in the right position, posture, and location, it is exactly the right size and it orbits around the most perfect star to support life. It formed from random gas clouds coming together and collapsing into a ball of mass.
2006-06-17 08:28:12 · 2 answers · asked by Rockstar 6 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
Chances of that happening were 1 in 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. Then life formed. The chances of that were about the same as a man finding a single marked grain of sand in the vast Sahara desert, and then doing it again two more times.
If all that happened under chance, wouldn't it be plausible that another animal on Earth developed speech and intelligence capabilities (and I don't mean speech like a Macall.)?
2006-06-17 08:30:53 · update #1
That was a 1 followed by 25 zeros by the way.
2006-06-17 08:31:22 · update #2
I didn't calculate them, someone told them to me after they calculated them, so I'm not sure how feasible they are, but I'm going with it for now.
2006-06-18 08:04:15 · update #3
How exactly did you calculate the odds? BTW under the same logic earth was just one (of the many?) successes - think of how many didn't make it.
The idea of an intelligent creator is equally as illogical as existence from nothing.
The science of the big bang may be mostly conjecture but the 'creator' hypothesis is 100% faith. Neither can be show to be right, both are opinion.
Peace out
2006-06-17 08:33:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think the chances of the big bang being real is the same as a tornado going through a junkyard and making a boeing 757. Therefore I dismiss the Big Bang theory. But about your question, if the chances of creating earth are so small, don't you think making another intelligent, speech capable animal should have a smaller chance?
2006-06-17 15:36:46 · answer #2 · answered by hsham 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋