North Korea preparing for missile test
Long-range weapon has potential
to strike mainland America, official says
But hey!
At least Bush took care of the
bigger threats to USA by
killing those Iraqi citizens, right!
2006-06-17 07:43:02 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
you got that right!!!!!!!
2006-06-17 07:46:32 · answer #1 · answered by Wendi 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question deserves a two part answer.
#1 Yes, I am very glad we took care of the Iraq situation.
Because of it, Libya has renounced its WMD program, Pakistan is now a close ally, Saudi Arabia has stopped playing both sides of the fence and is now committed to waging war against the terrorists, Syria has pulled its troops out of Lebanon, Afghanistan and Iraq are now legitimate democracies, and so on......
Wow...... how's that for transforming a region in the span of a few years. Such a brisk pace is unprecedented in history.
This is what Lebanese infitada leader Walid Jumblatt said:
"It's strange for me to say it, but this process of change has started because of the American invasion of Iraq," explains Jumblatt. "I was cynical about Iraq. But when I saw the Iraqi people voting three weeks ago, 8 million of them, it was the start of a new Arab world." Jumblatt says this spark of democratic revolt is spreading. "The Syrian people, the Egyptian people, all say that something is changing. The Berlin Wall has fallen. We can see it."
The best part was when Speigel magazine (Germany) ran the headline: Could George W. Bush Be Right?
#2 Don't blame the U.S. for the death of Iraqi citizens. Blame the terrorists. Iraq has a democratically elected government. Everyone has been invited to take part in the political process. However, the Islama-fascist terrorists like Al-Zarkawi do not want to share power. They want to impose their will on all Iraq.
Sorry for such a long explanation, but I hope it will produce the following result: Please read the links below. Think about them. Tell us faithful Yahoo Answers followers if you have changed your mind. Remember, the definition of a liberal is someone with an open mind
2006-06-17 08:12:56 · answer #2 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can see by your comments that you are a very insightful and a thought-provoking individual. North Korea is shaking its international "spare some change" cup. They threaten and look for the coins to drop in the cup.
.............and I thought Iraqi citizens were being targeted by Islamic extremists (car bombs in marketplaces strike you as out of the ordinary?)
The self-proclaimed "Great Leader" of North Korea presents a classic case as to why assassination is a good thing. Sacrificing the few to save the many is a worthy pursuit.
2006-06-17 08:25:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey that was Bush's stadagy all along, what do you do about the nukes in North Korea, you attack Iraq. IQ 72 and falling from the booze and drugs.
2006-06-17 07:57:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scout asserts that unemployment replace into greater under Bush's administration. that's no longer actual. Obama replace into going to diminish unemployment and it went up truly. persons are afraid of his strikes and basically approximately universally against his well being plan. feels like in user-friendly terms a sprint for a great sort of persons at a intense value.
2016-10-31 01:15:30 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ya, listen Britney Spears, it wasn't the citizens we were after in Iraq. It was the corrupt Government.
When you have trash all over the yard you have to start somewhere to clean it up.
2006-06-17 07:55:23 · answer #6 · answered by sshazzam 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Okay, what would you recommend without changing the past? What is the next step that we take considering everything that is going on now Mr. Armchair President? You wouldn't be happy no matter who is in office, or what their policy is.
2006-06-17 07:48:46 · answer #7 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a failed administration, history will record the Bush team as demented with George gullible to older more experienced, Cheney, Rummy, etc..,,,and Rove's bad influence as his brain,, so damaged, he had difficulty looking into eyes and souls
2006-06-17 08:27:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
stop picking on the republicans. do you know how many democrats voted for bush? God i'm glad to be a libertarian.
2006-06-17 07:49:07 · answer #9 · answered by ~*~ Flutterby ~*~ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
middle east land of peace harmony. why no democratics president. muslim america support to mr democratics president.
miss neddie woman all for correct. bush not the good to middle east islam people. (praise be to allah) only democratics good to middle east, bush for to love war only .
2006-06-17 08:27:16 · answer #10 · answered by NONAME 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true, but im not afraid of North Korea. I highly doubt they have missles at all
2006-06-17 07:47:16 · answer #11 · answered by khaoticwarchild 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋