2006-06-17 07:16:02 · 29 answers · asked by sonya o 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Dancing
no
2006-06-17 07:18:56 · answer #1 · answered by Rufus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think she's a horrible singer in fact. It really comes out in that one slow, ballady-type song she has. (I don't remember the name.) She needs to stick to acting. I liked her so much more when she was Jennifer Lopez, before she became "Jlo".
2006-06-17 14:52:17 · answer #2 · answered by autumnfaerie8 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like JLO but no, girlfriend can't sing. shes a better actress thou
2006-06-17 14:20:01 · answer #3 · answered by keziah 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Jlo might be an excellent farter.
2006-06-17 14:19:03 · answer #4 · answered by JustJake 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She has an okay voice I suppose but she's not the greatest. There's so many more talented singers out there...
2006-06-17 14:19:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really. At least she had some good songs in the beginning. Now, all that hip-hop stuff makes her look so fake.
2006-06-21 14:37:22 · answer #6 · answered by Mary Contrary 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she's a better dancer. That's the same way I feel about Britney Spears too.
2006-06-17 14:19:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's okay, but her dancing SUCKS!!! I hated the remake she and Gere did of Shall We Dance. You want to see some dancing, get the original Japanese version.
2006-06-23 10:42:48 · answer #8 · answered by Samba Queen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no she isnt a good singer. she is a better actress than she will ever be a singer. she is more famous for her butt than her singing
2006-06-17 14:59:21 · answer #9 · answered by icegod_0012003 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO...can't even remember one of her songs right now..she's a good actress though
2006-06-17 14:20:38 · answer #10 · answered by chinch 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is obviouly adequate...she has made a basket full of money doing it. So it doesn' t matter what I think.
2006-06-17 14:58:27 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋