Have a life size tatoo of Celine Dion on your back, or have a testicle under each armpit!?!
2006-06-17 05:01:20 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
celine dions face i meant!!!!!!
2006-06-17 05:05:17 · update #1
Well,.....having a testicle under each armpit would make it easier to scratch my balls in public without drawing attention.
2006-06-17 05:13:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 4⤋
armpit testicles... at least they can be easily removed. You do realize a life size tattoo means my back would have to be six feet long.That would be way more awkward than a couple of swinging testicles.
2006-06-17 05:05:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Testicles can be removed... right?
(I'm not sure that a life size tatoo would fit on my back!)
2006-06-17 05:03:18 · answer #3 · answered by guest 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The testicle thing might make roll on deodorants kind of fun!
2006-06-17 05:17:12 · answer #4 · answered by The Wandering Blade 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
totally celine dion tattoo, because then I would worry about bursting my sacs when scrub in a shower, and oh yeah THATS DISGUSTING!!!!!1
2006-06-17 06:03:58 · answer #5 · answered by Chunkylover53 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tuff one...not sure uumm yeah gonna go with the testicles!
Your crazy!!
2006-06-17 05:10:34 · answer #6 · answered by blondebirdcrazy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither tyvm. I agree with the guy who said he wants more intelligent questions!!
2006-06-17 05:06:40 · answer #7 · answered by just me 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
but if they're functioning testicles, does that mean you no longer have the *ahem* other ones? and if so ..... actually, no. i don't want to start that question :O
2006-06-17 05:58:08 · answer #8 · answered by stufetta 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going with the tattoo. I would be able to cover that up, and it wouldn't be so uncomfortable.
2006-06-17 05:04:23 · answer #9 · answered by boit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. HSes an idiot and the would hurt.
2006-06-17 05:05:23 · answer #10 · answered by rabatvilla 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋