i think that the Nba is wrong 4 suspended him .
2006-06-17 03:51:40 · 16 answers · asked by oakland2hot 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
Yes. He wasn't going for a block, and he was head hunting. I know it's Shaq who got fouled, but that shouldn't matter. Head hunting should be an automatic suspension.
2006-06-17 03:55:48 · answer #1 · answered by Mario B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you girl, he shouldn't have been suspended.
This is exactly what Shaq said, "My daughters tackle me harder when I come home," O'Neal said. "I'm one of the last players of the old school, and you know, you just have to take a hard foul like that and keep on moving. It actually felt pretty good to get hit like that. Thank you, Jerry. Appreciate it."
!!Omg! Okay, how can that be called foul and a suspension. I mean, Shaqille O'Neal wasn't penalized for hitting Stackhouse hard enough in Game 1 that he opened a gash across the top of his nose that required three stitches to close!! Okay that's way tougher than having a hit that "is less painful than a tackle from his daughters." The NBA is way off for suspending him! This isn't the right timing for a suspension and is all just a piece of *.
2006-06-17 08:51:58 · answer #2 · answered by nerd.:) 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY
He should have been fined 10k and thats it. He wasn't trying to hurt Shaq. He was just stopping him from making a basket. Also, the refs didnt call a flagrant when Shaq got Stackhouse on the nose or Dirk on the jaw. The Heat are getting away with their rough play and the Mavs are being called for everything.
2006-06-18 13:37:28 · answer #3 · answered by mavsfan89 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
David Stern has just lost his cottonpicking mind for suspending him! Stackhouse has been screwed out of playing in the NBA Finals!
2006-06-17 08:26:41 · answer #4 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I 100% agree with u. That was bullshit, and this suspension could cause them to lose game 6. It was a celan foul, and shaq just made it look bad since he threw himself even more. Stack shouldnt have been suspeneded at a time lick this, and i think this could fuel the mavs to win, or it can hurt them since stack is the #1 option of the bench. either way that was a celan foul, tahst the only thing you can do to shaq.
2006-06-17 03:54:01 · answer #5 · answered by shaqandkobeconnection 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It was a hard and intentional foul, but still, I don't think that he was not trying to hurt Shaq. If anything he was trying to get Shaq mad enough to get his second technical. If he was truely trying to hurt him then I say suspend him for the rest of the season. That's not the case here.
2006-06-17 04:01:12 · answer #6 · answered by razed58 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YA THE dar n NBA ia always doing stuff like that. Some one needs to kick the NBA in the drawers.
2006-06-17 03:54:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He deserved to be suspended for the hard foul on Shaq.
2006-06-17 04:42:37 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2006-06-17 08:01:02 · answer #9 · answered by sylvia g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me too. If it hadn't been a superstar on the other end, he wouldn't have. Hey NBA, Let 'em play!
BTW...I'm not a Mavs fan.
2006-06-17 03:54:48 · answer #10 · answered by optionseeker1989 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋