Do you think that Bin Laden is like Hitler?

Answer 1

No, i dont think so. I dont think that Bin Laden even destroyed the twin towers. He is a muslim and very wealthy. Bush just wanted to bring muslims in the lime light because it is the only true religon. He has to hide now from a crime he didn't commit. Bush just wanted to frame him. Actually Bush's fat self planned everything that happened to the twin towers. It was all his doing.

Answer 2

No, Hitler was in charge...Bin Laden has become nothing more than a hyped up figurehead. At least Hitler went out fighting Bin Laden is going out hiding.

Answer 3

They both were pretty dumb at the end of the day. That is not to say that they didn't make daring, bold decisions and cast a spell over idiots. In Bin Laden's case it is the hopeless Arabs. In Hitler's case it was basically the entire German nation.

I don't think they are that similar because Hitler was a self-made man. He was inbred. He was proletarian.

Bin Laden is the son of a billionaire.

Neither of them worked a day in their lives, so they are similar in that respect.

Bush is practically the same person as Bin Laden. They both hate their father's politics and "liberalism" in regards to religion. They both are embraced by the "trash" of their societies even though they are both very very wealthy. Neither of them were distinguished militarily. Bin Laden has been described as a moron by the Saudis. Both have ties to the CIA.

Answer 4

Bin Laden is a spoiled littel rich boy playing at big man. He's one of the wealthiest men in the world who has nothing better to do than to play jihad with narrow minded and twisted views on one of the worlds most beautiful religions. (Kind of like Pat Robertson).

Hitler was a poor kid from a broken home who had no real chance in life. All his dreams were smashed to bits when he was turned away from Art School. instead of being broken he turned around and fought back. Unfortunately he fought back against a group of people who had nothing to do with his own failures and resentments. he then took a poverty stricken, starving nation and almost took over the world. While I deplore what he did to the Jews, Gypsies, Catholics, Homosexuals and just about anyone he didn't like, you gotta admit that he almost took over the world.

Answer 5

No. Bin Laden is the modern Hannibal, and I don't mean Lecter.

Hannibal's Carthage (now Tunisia), like most Mediterranean and European countries, was under siege from Rome's brutal empire, corrupt rulers ordering the army steal wealth from other nations. (Does that sound familiar? Nero fiddled, Shrub read "My Pet Goat".)

Hannibal took an army and a pack of elephants across Africa, Spain, and through the Alps into Italy to attack Rome. (Does that sound familiar? Hannibal had jumbo elephants, bin Laden had jumbo jets.)

While Hannibal may not have succeeded in destroying Rome, he scared the piss out of the Romans and was the first sign of Rome's decline and fall. (Does that sound familiar?)

Answer 6

No, Hitler killed MILLIONS of people, stripped their bodies and tore families apart. Starved and tortured so many. Bin Laden is evil, but not so set on the destruction of a entire race. Bin Laden is sneaky and cowardly in his actions which makes him dangerous, but Hilter was way more evil and sick! He was a monster and there is no comparison.

Answer 7

Hitler came out in public... (not that I like him)
Bin Laden is a coward !

Answer 8

Not even close. Hitler, although very sick and twisted, had a specific goal in mind. He also had massive support from his countrymen. Bin Laden is a sad little man living in the dirt somewhere whose mind has been clouded by religion.

Answer 9

Despite the horrific nature of bin laden's deeds; their scope and his reasons for commiting them are simply not comparable to hitler.

Answer 10

They both have/had megalomaniac ideas of dominance, and a certain "dislike" of Jews. Hiltler was out in front of the people, Bin Laden (a spoiled lilttle rich boy) has never been a "public" figure, prefering to spout bile from hiding.