English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

That's correct.

2006-06-17 02:25:30 · answer #1 · answered by thylawyer 7 · 0 1

Development.
People who say the world is coming to an end are seriously stupid. The earth can take a hell of a lot more than what we're doing right now. Humans will just be the ones that'll be screwed.
But really the only things leading it towards destruction(for us) are all the pollution and umm...Bill O' Reilly.

2006-06-17 02:29:09 · answer #2 · answered by David S 1 · 0 0

This is the essence of life, for in order for there to be development, there has to be destruction. One thing has to end to make way for new creation. If nothing was destroyed, the world would be so full no-one would be able to move. Death is a part of life and the reason for creation. The moment something is created, it is headed for its destruction. The moment you are born, you begin your journey towards death.

2006-06-17 03:32:18 · answer #3 · answered by Jimbo 6 · 0 0

Both. However, I prefer to use the word "Discardation" instead of "Destruction" and the word "Evolution" instead of "Development" . When you find new ways of living more appealing, you discard the old ways. If you look back in the history of mankind, you will find lot of the concepts discarded and were replaced with new ones. There may not be a clear cut line of discardation or destruction, because it is a gradual change - an evolving civilization.

2006-06-17 03:00:30 · answer #4 · answered by stvenryn 4 · 0 0

Destruction by men to some extent, but then true destruction of just wicked people, and survivors of only righteous. Then there will be development on this earth for 1000 years, and then the earth will finally be restored to a paradise the way it was originally intended.

2006-06-17 02:27:10 · answer #5 · answered by Gail B 3 · 0 0

Development then destruction.

2006-06-17 02:27:28 · answer #6 · answered by songbird 6 · 0 0

Both things go hand in hand, destruction then development then destruction and development again.

2006-06-17 02:42:10 · answer #7 · answered by ash_m_79 6 · 0 0

in the path of destruction, the reason i say this is because of the production of anti-matter, a new scintifical break through, if you don't know what it is, well let me just say nuclear is nothing compared to it

2006-06-17 02:30:17 · answer #8 · answered by Hades, Depressed & Dangerous 2 · 0 0

If we do not take care of the world we will eventually destroy it. We are developing it at an alarming rate which might be to our detriment.

2006-06-17 02:32:22 · answer #9 · answered by Mary M 1 · 0 0

destruction morally, developement in technology... that is used to destroy things really.

2006-06-17 02:26:07 · answer #10 · answered by Muslim extremist 2 · 0 0

We're on our way to a utopia, the world's just gone to shite in the mean-time.

2006-06-17 02:29:03 · answer #11 · answered by flowerpowernower 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers