English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you believe we elvolved from monkeys? What did they evolve from? How did life start from the start? How do you think human life began?

2006-06-17 01:04:36 · 20 answers · asked by Steven R 1 in Social Science Other - Social Science

Where did God come from?

2006-06-17 01:09:17 · update #1

It's impossible to explain how anything was created, as it is infinity, there is no beginning and there wil never be no ending!

2006-06-17 01:10:22 · update #2

20 answers

A spark of energy that became conscious of itself and kept expanding

2006-06-17 01:09:15 · answer #1 · answered by Kashmir527 2 · 0 2

Life is probably the result of a certain combination of ingredients and conditions that may be found throughout the universe. Given the right conditions and ingredients, life appears (usully as one-celled or smaller). As this life develops, other life-forms appear. Life is "eternal" in this sense--it always exists, never needs to be created, cannot be destroyed (forever everywhere).

Human life on Earth may have begun in any number of ways, no one really knows. Maybe some other "humans" from a different planet and star system came here and started the breed. Maybe we evolved from monkeys (but I doubt this; I think we evolved from donkeys--asses--given how stupid and violent and cruel we are). If "God" created humans, then he/she/it did a lousy job. If we're made in the "image" of god, then god is a violent, sadistic, psychopathic, liar, fool, and general screw-up.

2006-06-17 01:16:25 · answer #2 · answered by Pandak 5 · 0 0

For all those quoting evolution and big bang theories.
and They are just theories btw.
Where are all the missing links??
There are such huge gaps in one supposed survivor of the fittest and the next - too incredible. Even Darwin was not a believer in his own theoretical works. And if we DID evolve then we are still evolving - but into what ? Are we all going to disappear one day and suddenly be replaced by a more superior being - the next survivor of the fittest? I think NOT.

God created all things.
Our minds may not be able to comprehend that fact but maybe thats because we only use about 3% of our brains - if they were to be opened up to full capacity however, something seemingly impossible, like creation, would be more readily acceptable and a greater understanding would be achieved.

2006-06-20 11:11:49 · answer #3 · answered by headcage 3 · 1 1

it seems a lot of people on here are of the religious form. believing that god made us all, like walt disney made mickey mouse.
the earth was formed from the supposed "big bang" in space that created the planet. i'm no scientist, but i'm only going off stuff from school and other informative sites. life was evolved from the smallest being possible - the amoeba. humans did evolve from apes. at the very lower of your back (just above your butt) is a small piece of bone. this is where our "tail" should have been, but having evolved, tails never came with us.

2006-06-17 01:12:21 · answer #4 · answered by dan 1 · 0 0

In the beginning man created God.

2006-06-22 20:04:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Origin of life: Life is a multi-faceted concept that may refer to the ongoing process of which living things are a part or the period between fertilisation or mitosis and death.
There is no truly "standard" model for the origin of life, but most currently accepted scientific models build in one way or another on the following discoveries, which are listed roughly in order of postulated emergence:

Plausible pre-biotic conditions result in the creation of the basic small molecules of life. This was demonstrated in the Urey-Miller experiment.
Phospholipids spontaneously form lipid bilayers, the basic structure of a cell membrane.
Procedures for producing random RNA molecules can produce ribozymes, which are able to produce more of themselves under very specific conditions.
There are many different hypotheses regarding the path that might have been taken from simple organic molecules to protocells and metabolism. Many models fall into the "genes-first" category or the "metabolism-first" category, but a recent trend is the emergence of hybrid models that do not fit into either of these categories.

Life is tenacious, and it completely permeates the surface layer of the planet. We find life beneath the deepest ocean, on the highest mountain, in the driest desert and the coldest glacier, and deep down in the crustal rocks and sediments.
The origin of life: the Earth was formed about 5 billion years ago. A series of giant meteorites ("the late heavy bombardment") essentially sterilized the planet about 3.8 billion years ago. Rocks 3.5 billion years old contain microfossils of primitive one-celled organisms without a nucleus ("prokaryotes") resembling bacteria and blue-green algae, and carbon isotope ratios characteristic of biological materials, representing the earliest clear signs of life. The first cells with a nucleus ("eukaryotes") appeared 2 billion years ago, and the first organisms made up of many cells (multicellular algae) appeared about 1.8 billion years ago.

In addition to prokaryotes and eukaryotes, a third major group of organisms, called Archaea, consisting of about 500 species but making up about 30% of the biomass on Earth, was not discovered until 1977. They live in the most extreme environments on Earth - the hottest, coldest, and highest-pressure environments, so they are sometimes called "extremophiles". Most of their known biomass is in the Antarctic.

The rooting of the Tree of Life, and the relationships of the major lineages, are controversial. The monophyly of Archaea is uncertain, and recent evidence for ancient lateral transfers of genes indicates that a highly complex model is needed to adequately represent the phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of Life.

2006-06-17 01:37:46 · answer #6 · answered by nan.sweety 3 · 0 0

In Buddism, it is said that the first people on earth are fallen angles from the heaven of "Light and Sound". They visited earth, tasted the sweet water of earch and then became greedy [read = their pure energy form is affected by interaction with the earth chemicals].
Because of this, they were no longer able to return to the heaven and became man and women on earth.

2006-06-17 01:26:38 · answer #7 · answered by pk_l 1 · 0 1

Well, I believe the evidence points to a young-earth creation theory. In my own studies, I have found it to be around 6,000 years old. At this point, anybody with a rational, open mind can clearly see that evolution has far less evidence for it.

2006-06-17 01:11:14 · answer #8 · answered by g2gtech 1 · 0 1

I think it started when the earth was young and lighting struck a pond full off chemicals which created a single cell amoeba, the rest is just evolution.

2006-06-17 01:23:15 · answer #9 · answered by johnbradcity 2 · 0 1

As we are natural how can we comprehend the supernatural. we are bound by limited time so how can we understand the timeless, God is beyond our understanding we cant even understand the earth properly so how can we begin to understand life and its genesis.

2006-06-17 02:49:08 · answer #10 · answered by comission90 2 · 0 0

It began when God created the earth!

2006-06-17 01:07:49 · answer #11 · answered by LetMEtell&AskYOU 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers