2006-06-16 21:24:10 · 23 answers · asked by sonu 2 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Both do not have the kind of quality in their bowling which a fast bowler should have. The are still inexperienced. Munaf Patel is much better than these 2.
2006-06-16 21:36:37 · answer #1 · answered by PREETAM W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of Course Sreesanth.
2006-06-17 05:04:23 · answer #2 · answered by Nirav 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sreesanth
2006-06-18 00:52:33 · answer #3 · answered by nasdaqnyseftse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now considering that our team has quite a few left hand bowlers, Sreesanth definetely gives more variety. Plus he is more aggressive. My vote goes to Sreesanth.
2006-06-17 04:27:22 · answer #4 · answered by jash.casanova 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
S.Sreeshanth is better coz he has played more matches than rp singh is is a better bowler than him he also has gone to west indies so he also seen that wickets so it will hielp im in the world cup.
2006-06-17 14:47:27 · answer #5 · answered by GoodLooking 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely sreesanth
2006-06-17 06:33:21 · answer #6 · answered by siddharth kumar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sreesanth. He bowls quicker, accurate and plays more for India. Whats more he picked up a 6 wicket haul lately!
India need those guys yaar...
2006-06-17 06:04:30 · answer #7 · answered by Oye chak de phatte!! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Munaf is better than this two. comparing with RP singh Sreesanth is good.
2006-06-17 08:31:52 · answer #8 · answered by jagan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
r.p singh . sreesanth has performed very inconsistently and conceeded lot of runs , also does not seem to be having many arms in his armoury
2006-06-17 05:20:04 · answer #9 · answered by parinda 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who else rather than S. Sreesanth?
2006-06-17 07:03:34 · answer #10 · answered by Appu 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋