English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

is it true that jury-trial seems always to give a guilty verdict

2006-06-16 18:18:36 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

8 answers

It would depend on what type of evidence, witness, and the severity of the charge. To plea bargain you know what you are facing, for they tell you what time you will do if any, as with a jury trial, your taking a gamble. If there isn't to much evidence or witnesses...maybe a jury trial is better...also, if they have other charges pending against you, to take the plea bargain 9 times out of 10 they drop them as well as drop the level of the felony etc....Take these things into consideration before making a choice...also consult with att.

2006-06-22 14:43:08 · answer #1 · answered by lilbreeze2000 3 · 0 0

I'd take my case "to the box"--jury trial. My husband had 5 cases consolidated into one against 5 different police departments and although it takes long, we won all 5 verdicts by acquittal. Plea bargains are to keep the majority of cases rolling in and out. If every defendant chose a jury trial, the justice system would grind to a halt with work. But if you are not guilty of an offense, why cop a plea to make their job easier? Ask for a trial. Then they have to PROVE your guilt.

2006-06-16 18:49:07 · answer #2 · answered by HisChamp1 5 · 0 0

99 % of all cases never go to a jury trial because the government offers too great of a deal for a defendant to risk being convicted after a jury trial, and in some cases, face up to twice or three times longer the length of incarceration than if s/he would have pled guilty.

That being said, it all depends on (1) are you guilty? and (2) the strength of the government's case.

Every crime has certain elements that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. You must review, with your lawyer, the evidence the government says it can present against you and decide whether that evidence meets all the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

Also, even if it does, do you have some sort of affirmative defense?

It all depends, but in most cases, if the government's work-up of its case is solid, it is better to take a plea because you will spend less time in jail/prison for accepting responsibility and not using government resources for a case that is so readily proven against you.

2006-06-16 19:56:59 · answer #3 · answered by Randa 3 · 0 0

If you are guilty take the plea bargain. If your innocent, go to a jury trial.

2006-06-16 18:50:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if you're not guilty, then jury trial. accepting a plea bargain is an admission of some guilt

2006-06-16 18:24:38 · answer #5 · answered by marty w 1 · 0 0

Depends on the case, no way to tell with out knowing all the facts but plea bargain may be the safe bet unfortunately

2006-06-16 18:28:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Actually, it's usually the opposite. Most juries find for the defendant because most jurors are borderline criminals themselves.

You won't find many fat, rich Republicans sitting on a jury.

2006-06-16 19:25:39 · answer #7 · answered by Left the building 7 · 0 0

you're envisioned to inform the reality in inspite of questions you're requested. it really is it. Summons and subpoena are an same element. Summons is for a civil case (like yours). Subpoena is for a criminal case. definite, you need to look in both case. you'll get despatched to reformatory, if omitted.

2016-11-14 21:30:25 · answer #8 · answered by mastrolia 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers