English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

or any other forward .........? i aint critising just opinions

2006-06-16 18:17:00 · 8 answers · asked by neil a 1 in Sports Football FIFA World Cup (TM)

or who would you have i aint slating the choices made by sven..............@

2006-06-16 18:18:42 · update #1

some one put you cant answer your own question. its meant if it was up to you what strikers would you like to of been there, if you dont agree with the strikers who have gone......................?

2006-06-16 18:36:20 · update #2

some one put you cant answer your own question. its meant if it was up to you what strikers would you like to of been there, if you dont agree with the strikers who have gone......................?

2006-06-16 18:36:27 · update #3

8 answers

Bent is highest Scoring, ENGLISH striker in the Premier League, Defoe is pretty good, Walcott is untested.

I would take Bent but walcott could turn out to be the next Owen.

2006-06-16 18:21:05 · answer #1 · answered by Paul J 2 · 0 0

Question as far as this World Cup is concerned is irrelevant. Walcott is in the squad. If Sven was to pick again, I would hope Defoe would be picked as we lack a natural goalscorer at times. Defoe could be thrown with fifteen minutes to go and need only one chance to score. From the limited time I have seen D Bent he is not ruthless enough to score but he brings a lot in his team play. Defoe, final answer.

2006-06-17 03:21:53 · answer #2 · answered by brogdenuk 7 · 0 0

Okay, here goes. The first choice eleven is good, s long s everyone is fit, but if you sub a striker for a midfielder(Paraguay), surely a lone striker who can play upfront on his own would be best, so thats agood argument for Bent, with Carrick in front of the defense, allowing Gerrard and Lampard to get forward.
And that is all the praise that this Gooner is giving to Chelsea, Charlton and Tottenham players.

2006-06-17 04:32:04 · answer #3 · answered by AdeyAde 3 · 0 0

For me it would have to be Defoe. Bent is a bit untested at national level wheras defoe has a few games.

walcott comes recommended by a frenchman who wont play him in the premier league/champions league -so can he be that good. Granted he scored some goals in div 1 - but how many players have we seen do nothing in the prem after being bought from div 1 - any leicester city supporters will remember ade akinbadbuy!!

i think sven has got it wrong. lennon looks a quality player but he wont get a look in whilst gerrad and lampard sit in midfield.

2006-06-17 07:06:56 · answer #4 · answered by webbo 1 · 0 0

It's like all of the English people have gone "cuckoo". No offese. I mean Sven probably put on Walcott cuz hes a young kid and he probably didn't have to sign any contract sheets. Walcott has never even played for his club Arsenal before. NEVER.

2006-06-17 01:23:40 · answer #5 · answered by antony sulentic(croat and proud) 1 · 0 0

2 good players that should have been picked one of them should have but no kept Walcott who has not played a game only in reserve

2006-06-20 18:52:55 · answer #6 · answered by LEONARDO P 3 · 0 0

defoe is bent

2006-06-17 10:43:47 · answer #7 · answered by scott m 1 · 0 0

Defoe is more tested.

2006-06-17 01:25:25 · answer #8 · answered by allnationsca 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers