2006-06-16 17:35:04 · 11 answers · asked by Hillbillies are... 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
If by irresitable force you mean Chuck Norris, and by an immoveable object you mean Chuck Norris, then you have already answered your own questions. You know what I mean.
2006-06-16 17:39:23 · answer #1 · answered by k0stiia 2 · 9⤊ 4⤋
It seems to be an interesting question, but it's illogical. If there's an irresistable force, ther can't be an immovable object. You have to choose between on or the other either the irresistable force or the immovable object.
2006-06-17 02:21:49 · answer #2 · answered by Kayv 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can that be? Chuck Norris is a irresistible force and immovable object.
2006-06-17 00:42:08 · answer #3 · answered by psych0bug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Either the "irresistable" force or the "immovable" object isn't.
2006-06-17 00:42:43 · answer #4 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chuck Norris soup... Ewwww
2006-06-17 00:43:10 · answer #5 · answered by Jembee1720 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The force and the object wouldn't stand a chance. :)
2006-06-17 00:39:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very happily it would rid the human race of such an annoying man.
2006-06-17 00:41:03 · answer #7 · answered by -Tequila17 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chunky salsa
2006-06-17 00:39:38 · answer #8 · answered by Carl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You would have the Big Bang, part 2. :)
2006-06-17 00:38:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hehehe... SPLAT!!!!!!
2006-06-17 00:53:02 · answer #10 · answered by xenonbomb2000 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋