Yeah I have seen it and I don't find anything that wrong with it....no intimate scenes I think I don't know...have your ma check what it is rated for but if you've seen those others you mentioned then yeah Man on Fire is more than okay for an 11 yr. old.
2006-06-16 17:44:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Well this might sound bad, but my 4 year old loves that movie. I mean yeah the guy gets shot, but so does Bugs Bunny, right? There's no nudity. It depends on the maturity of your child. You know your child well enough to know if it's appropriate. If you've seen it before, then you should know, if not, then maybe watch it first and you decide.
2006-06-16 17:36:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Doesnt Matter 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, I hated the movie. It's gratuitously violent and not very well done (despite Denzel), so I wouldn't recommend it.
Here's something for both you and your mom, however: check out the Movie Mom (who happens to be Yahoo's critic) at www.moviemom.com. She not only writes rather well, but she also provides viewing guides for parents -- and will let both you and your mom know what sort of things to expect from all sorts of films. (Of note: she doesn't just watch traditional "kid-oriented" films, but has a take on virtually everything.)
2006-06-16 17:51:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jeff M 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly i'd say irrelevant outfits for a 13 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old will be shorts or skirts that are shorter than your palms in the journey that they are through your aspects,tight outfits, and any tops that prepare bare shoulders, bra straps, or are shrink below the collar bone. i do not truly get why your moms and dads does no longer pick you to positioned on a lengthy gown, even if...
2016-11-14 21:29:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by mastrolia 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I couldn't tell you cause I haven't seen it myself. But if you want to know about the detailed aspects of why the movie is rated R, go to kidsinmind.com. They tell you what to expect in a movie without spoiling too much of the plot.
2006-06-16 17:32:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is more of the intensity. I don't know how he'll handle the scene with the guy having a load of C4 stuffed up his anal cavity and left to explode and the ending is rather violent in its proximity
2006-06-16 17:31:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you've seen those other movies without any questions, I think you'll be ok with man on fire.
2006-06-16 17:31:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by SUM22 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That depends on the 13 yr old. If she is hyper-sensitive to crappy endings it may be too soon for this particular film.
2006-06-16 17:34:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by der_grosse_e 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i watched it last year when i was 13, i think its appropriate. and its a really good movie.
2006-06-16 17:30:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes you are old enough for it
it is slightly violent but only in context and it is a great movie
2006-06-16 17:31:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋