no.....roger is in the top 5 in greatest pitchers of all time but no1 can take away what cy young did in his career.
511 wins
2803 Ks (not that many but still alot)
511 wins
2.63 ERA
oh yea and did i mention 511 wins?
look, if they do rename the cy young award, the roger will be 1st in line to take the trophy title
2006-06-16 16:08:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sean 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
ok...so what happens to Cy Young? Thats like suddenly putting Clinton on the one dollar bill. Rodger also has to get a couple hundred more wins to reachYoung. And he wont even have as many wins as Cy Young had losses. The award he could qualify would be most money ever made during a career for a pitcher. The "Rocket" award...$$$$$$$$$
2006-06-24 17:54:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Druby 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let's see. Cy Young won 511 games, about 90 more than second place's Walter Johnson. No. Clemens' place in baseball history is secure (roughly 340 wins), but he's not deserving of having the award renamed after him.
2006-06-16 16:02:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jim M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If what McNamee has reported became actual, it variety of feels Clemens first used steroids in mid 1997, the position Clemens became 8-6 previously, then went 13-a million. i believe Schilling became in simple terms putting forward that Clemens were given an award yet another pitcher would had received with the remark about giving decrease back Cy youthful awards. Heck, you need to contemplate even if Randy Johnson has ever executed any unlawful drug use (runner up in 2 of the years in question), given the wide multi 3 hundred and sixty 5 days contracts he has received after age 40 had in no way made experience to me, yet will be logical if the Yankees knew he became utilising Steroids and/or HGH. it ought to also clarify why Schilling hasn't been provided wide multi 3 hundred and sixty 5 days contracts at a youthful age if baseball golf equipment knew he doesn't use HGH. as far as Bonds giving up homestead run titles, it really is stupid. inspite of each thing, Bonds ought to no longer had performed contained in the 1920's, blacks were barred from taking section in significant league baseball, yet no human being referred to as for Ruth to be stripped of his homestead run titles.
2016-11-14 21:24:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by weagraff 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Changing the name to Roger(the Rocket)Clemens would be an insult to win. CY Young had the most wins and ya the most losses, but back then they pitched on two days rest if that much, so you're going to lose because you're tired and you had no bullpen. So if you just absolutly couldn't pitch any longer you would forfeit the game. He also pitched for more than 20 years.
2006-06-27 15:15:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by seattle_slew_champ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, because CY Young has the single most dominant record in all of sports and so the award is called a CY Young. For it too be renamed the Rocket or suttin he would have to outdue Cy Young at suttin, which he wont
2006-06-16 15:58:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by magsflame32 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell No. Cy Young was way better than Roger Clemens ever was. Look at Cy's numbers and u'll c y its called the Cy Young
2006-06-27 04:32:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jonalds 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe and Maybe Not
I would pick Nolan Ryan to have it renamed after, but I definetly think it should be changed. Cy Young may have the most wins in MLB history, but he also has the most losses
2006-06-16 15:46:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by n1ck34@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Clemens is one of the greats, and a sure bet as a first-ballot Hall of Famer. But Young is the best of all time. His career total of 511 wins will never be broken.
2006-06-16 16:09:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by frenchy62 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because cy young won 500 games. When Roger Clemens wins 500 games it should be (yeah right)
2006-06-16 15:48:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by sakhi93 4
·
0⤊
0⤋